About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Reviewers
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Guide for reviewers
Our reviewers
REVIEW PAPER
Bibliometric analysis of productivity and keyword trends of articles on physical therapy and aging (1990-2014)
1
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
2
Superior Council of Scientific Investigations, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, Paterna (Valencia), Spain
Submission date: 2020-02-04
Acceptance date: 2020-05-21
Publication date: 2021-08-13
Physiother Quart. 2021;29(3):1-12
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The increase in population longevity has led the subject of ageing to take an important role in research and innovation policies. Considerable efforts have been made worldwide to promote research on physiotherapy and ageing. Therefore, applying bibliometric measures can be useful to identify emerging and innovative scientific indicators. This study identifies productivity and topic trends in physiotherapy in ageing and the main publishing authors, institutions, and countries.
Methods:
A bibliometric analysis was applied in original articles published on the Science Citation Index Expanded of Web of Science Core Collection (1990–2014). Bibliometric indicators were obtained by using specific bibliometric software. Pearsons’ correlation coefficient (r) was applied for correlations; statistical significance was considered for p < 0.01.
Results:
Overall, 2237 original articles were included. Topic trends show an initial focus on illness and evolve towards the study of prevention. Authors and institutions increased productivity and citation. The most productive country was the United States, and there was a significant correlation between productivity and gross domestic product (p < 0.01). No statistically significant relationship was observed between productivity and the countries’ aged population.
Conclusions:
Productivity increased, with a greater scientific interest in prevention. The published research was mainly related to wealthy and developed countries.
The increase in population longevity has led the subject of ageing to take an important role in research and innovation policies. Considerable efforts have been made worldwide to promote research on physiotherapy and ageing. Therefore, applying bibliometric measures can be useful to identify emerging and innovative scientific indicators. This study identifies productivity and topic trends in physiotherapy in ageing and the main publishing authors, institutions, and countries.
Methods:
A bibliometric analysis was applied in original articles published on the Science Citation Index Expanded of Web of Science Core Collection (1990–2014). Bibliometric indicators were obtained by using specific bibliometric software. Pearsons’ correlation coefficient (r) was applied for correlations; statistical significance was considered for p < 0.01.
Results:
Overall, 2237 original articles were included. Topic trends show an initial focus on illness and evolve towards the study of prevention. Authors and institutions increased productivity and citation. The most productive country was the United States, and there was a significant correlation between productivity and gross domestic product (p < 0.01). No statistically significant relationship was observed between productivity and the countries’ aged population.
Conclusions:
Productivity increased, with a greater scientific interest in prevention. The published research was mainly related to wealthy and developed countries.
REFERENCES (81)
1.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World population prospects: the 2017 revision. 2017. Available from: https://www.un.org/development... [January 2018].
2.
Instituto de Mayores y Servicios Sociales (IMSERSO). 2016 report. The elderly in Spain. Statistical data by state and autonomous community [in Spanish]. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad; 2016. Available from: https://www.imserso.es/InterPr... [January 2018].
3.
World Health Organization. Global health estimates 2013: deaths by cause, age, sex and regional grouping, 2000–2012. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
4.
Abrahin O, Rodrigues RP, Nascimento VC, Da Silva-Grigoletto ME, Sousa EC, Marçal AC. Single- and multiple-set resistance training improves skeletal and respiratory muscle strength in elderly women. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1775–1782; doi: 10.2147/CIA.S68529.
5.
Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Successful aging. Gerontologist. 1997;37(4):433–440; doi: 10.1093/geront/37.4.433.
6.
Ferdows NB, Jensen GA, Tarraf W. Healthy aging after age 65: a life-span health production function approach. Res Aging. 2018;40(5):480–507; doi: 10.1177/0164027517713312.
7.
Gopinath B, Kifley A, Flood VM, Mitchell P. Physical activity as a determinant of successful aging over ten years. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10522; doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28526-3.
8.
World Confederation for Physical Therapy. WCPT guideline for physical therapist professional entry level education. London: WCPT; 2011. Available from: http://www.aefi.net/Portals/1/... [February 2018].
9.
Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, Bartali B, Cavazzini C, Di Iorio A, et al. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95(5):1851–1860; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003.
10.
Maher CG, Moseley AM, Sherrington C, Elkins MR, Herbert RD. A description of the trials, reviews, and practice guidelines indexed in the PEDro database. Phys Ther. 2008;88(9):1068–1077; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080002.
11.
Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, Maher CG. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(1):43–49; doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60281-6.
12.
Dean E, Davies J. Frequency of citation and reputational assessment of contributors in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1986;66(6):961–966; doi: 10.1093/ptj/66.6.961.
13.
Bohannon RW, Gibson DF. Citation analysis of Physical Therapy. A special communication. Phys Ther. 1986;66(4):540–541; doi: 10.1093/ptj/66.4.540.
14.
Pena Costa LO, Moseley AM, Sherrington C, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Elkins MR. Core journals that publish clinical trials of physical therapy interventions. Phys Ther. 2010;90(11):1631–1640; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090419.
15.
Maher CG, Moseley AM, Sherrington C, Herbert RD. Core journals of evidence-based physiotherapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2001;17(3):143–151; doi: 10.1080/095939801317077605.
16.
Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Sherrington C, Elkins MR. Reported quality of randomized controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions has improved over time. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(6):594–601; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.009.
17.
Bohannon RW, Roberts D. Core journals of rehabilitation: identification through index analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991;14(4):333–335.
18.
Tesio L, Gamba C, Capelli A, Franchignoni FP. Rehabilitation: the Cinderella of neurological research? A bibliometric study. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1995;16(7):473–477; doi: 10.1007/BF02229325.
19.
Lankhorst GJ, Franchignoni F. The ‘impact factor’ – an explanation and its application to rehabilitation journals. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(2):115–118; doi: 10.1191/026921501676657944.
20.
Maher CG, Sherrington C, Elkins M, Herbert RD, Moseley AM. Challenges for evidence-based physical therapy: accessing and interpreting high-quality evidence on therapy. Phys Ther. 2004;84(7):644–654; doi: 10.1093/ptj/84.7.644.
21.
Coronado RA, Wurtzel WA, Simon CB, Riddle DL, George SZ. Content and bibliometric analysis of articles published in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(12):920–931; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3808.
22.
Coronado RA, Riddle DL, Wurtzel WA, George SZ. Bibliometric analysis of articles published from 1980 to 2009 in Physical Therapy, journal of the American Physical Therapy Association. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):642–655; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100267.
23.
Wiles L, Matricciani L, Williams M, Olds T. Sixty-five years of Physical Therapy: bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1945 through 2010. Phys Ther. 2012;92(4):493–506; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110013.
24.
Svien L, Anderson S, Long T. Research in pediatric physical therapy: an analysis of trends in first fifteen years of publication. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006;18(2):126–132; doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000223104.28243.5e.
25.
Hoffmann T, Bennett S, McKenna K, Green-Hill J, McCluskey A, Tooth L. Interventions for stroke rehabilitation: analysis of the research contained in the OTseeker evidence database. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(4):341–350; doi: 10.1310/tsr1504-341.
26.
Elsner B. Systematic reviews for informing clinical practice. Physiother Res Int. 2018;23(1):e1703; doi: 10.1002/pri.1703.
27.
Snell K, Hassan A, Sutherland L, Chau L, Senior T, Janaudis-Ferreira T, et al. Types and quality of physical therapy research publications: has there been a change in the past decade? Physiother Can. 2014;66(4):382–391; doi: 10.3138/ptc.2013-67.
28.
Fernández JL, Parapar C, Ruiz M. Population ageing [in Spanish]. Lychnos. 2010;2:6–11.
29.
Boyack KW, Klavans R. Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65(4):670–685; doi: 10.1002/asi.22990.
30.
Huang M-H, Chang C-P. Detecting research fronts in OLED field using bibliographic coupling with sliding window. Scientometrics. 2014;98:1721–1744; doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1126-1.
31.
Glänzel W, Debackere K. On the opportunities and limitations in using bibliometric indicators in a policy relevant context. In: Bibliometric analysis in science and research: applications, benefits and limitations. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich; 2003; 225–236.
32.
Tilson JK, Marshall K, Tam JJ, Fetters L. A bibliometric analysis of statistical terms used in American Physical Therapy Association journals (2011–2012): evidence for educating physical therapists. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:118; doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0641-1.
33.
Yuan Y, Gretzel U, Tseng Y-H. Revealing the nature of contemporary tourism research: extracting common subject areas through bibliographic coupling. Int J Tour Res. 2015;17(5):417–431; doi: 10.1002/jtr.2004.
34.
Aleixandre-Benavent R, González-Alcaide G, Miguel-Dasit A, Navarro-Molina C, Valderrama-Zurián JC. Full-text publications in peer-reviewed journals derived from presentations at three ISSI conferences. Scientometrics. 2009;80(2):409–420; doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2066-z.
35.
Aleixandre JL, Aleixandre-Tudó JL, Bolaños-Pizzaro M, Aleixandre-Benavent R. Mapping the scientific research on wine and health (2001–2011). J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(49):11871–11880; doi: 10.1021/jf404394e.
36.
Aleixandre-Benavent R, Alonso-Arroyo A, Chorro-Gascó FJ, Alfonso-Manterola F, González-Alcaide G, Salvador-Taboada MJ, et al. Cardiovascular scientific production in Spain and in the European and global context (2003-2007) [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(12):1404–1417; doi: 10.1016/S0300-8932(09)73126-4.
37.
National Center for Biotechnology Information. Medical subject headings. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m... [November 2015].
38.
De Freitas AE, Herbert RD, Latimer J, Ferreira PH. Searching the LILACS database for Portuguese- and Spanish-language randomized trials in physiotherapy was difficult. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):233–237; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.014.
39.
García Ríos MC, Moreno Lorenzo C, Ruiz Baños R, Bailón Moreno R. Thematic analysis of the discipline of physiotherapy in the Web of Science [in Spanish]. Fisioterapia. 2010;32(4):159–164; doi: 10.1016/j.ft.2009.09.004.
40.
Wakiji EM. Mapping the literature of physical therapy. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997;85(3):284–288.
41.
World Confederation for Physical Therapy. WCPT glossary: terms used in WCPT’s policies and resources. London: WCPT; 2014.
42.
Thompson DF, Walker CK. A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(6):551–559; doi: 10.1002/phar.1586.
43.
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(46):16569–16572; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
44.
Ardanuy J. A brief introduction to bibliometrics [in Spanish]. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona, Departament de Biblioteconomia i Documentació; 2012.
45.
Jesus TS. Systematic reviews and clinical trials in rehabilitation: comprehensive analyses of publication trends. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):1853–1862.e2; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.017.
46.
Kocak FU, Unver B, Karatosun V. Level of evidence in four selected rehabilitation journals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(2):299–303; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.233.
47.
Sturmer G, Viero CCM, Silveira MN, Lukrafka JL, Plentz RDM. Profile and scientific output analysis of physical therapy researchers with research productivity fellowship from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(1):41–48; doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000068.
48.
Vernaza-Pinzón P, Álvarez-Bravo G. Latin American scientific output in physical therapy/kinesiology [in Spanish]. Aquichan. 2011;11(1):94–107; doi: 10.5294/1820.
49.
Miller PA, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. A quantitative analysis of research publications in physical therapy journals. Phys Ther. 2003;83(2):123–131; doi: 10.1093/ptj/83.2.123.
50.
Mogil JS, Simmonds K, Simmonds MJ. Pain research from 1975 to 2007: a categorical and bibliometric meta-trend analysis of every research paper published in the journal, Pain. Pain. 2009;142(1–2):48–58; doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.11.012.
51.
Smith DR, Rivett DA. Bibliometrics, impact factors and manual therapy: balancing the science and the art. Man Ther. 2009;14(4):456–459; doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.11.004.
52.
De Miguel Antón JL, Fernández Nuevo JL, Parapar Barrera C, Ruiz Yaniz M. Research on ageing [in Spanish]. Madrid: Fundación General CSIC; 2016. Available from: http://envejecimiento.csic.es/... [March 2018].
53.
Parapar Barrera C, Fernández Nuevo JL, Rey Campos J, Ruiz Yaniz M. I+D+i report on ageing [in Spanish]. Madrid: Fundación General CSIC; 2010. Available from: http://www.fgcsic.es/files/adj... [March 2018].
54.
Research agenda on ageing for the 21st century: 2007 update. New York: United Nations Programme on Ageing, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics; 2007. Available from: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/... [March 2018].
55.
Harmell AL, Jeste D, Depp C. Strategies for successful aging: a research update. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16(10):476; doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0476-6.
56.
Pruchno R, Carr D. Successful aging 2.0: resilience and beyond. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017;72(2):201–203; doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw214.
57.
Mazurek J, Sutkowska E, Szcześniak D, Urbańska KM, Rymaszewska J. FIMA, the questionnaire for health-related resource use in the elderly population: validity, reliability, and usage of the Polish version in clinical practice. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:787–795; doi: 10.2147/CIA.S158951.
58.
Seidl H, Bowles D, Bock J-O, Brettschneider C, Greiner W, König H-H, et al. FIMA – questionnaire for health-related resource use in an elderly population: development and pilot study [in German]. Gesundheitswesen. 2015;77(1):46–52; doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1372618.
59.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Active ageing: a political framework [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2002;37(Suppl. 2):74–105.
60.
Teixeira J, Monteiro L, Silvestre R, Beckert J, Massuça LM. Age-related influence on physical fitness and individual on-duty task performance of Portuguese male non-elite police officers. Biol Sport. 2019;36(2):163–170; doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2019.83506.
61.
Ribera Casado JM. Investigation in aging today. Principal health challenges. Perspective from geriatrics [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2001;36(Suppl. 3):7–12.
62.
World Health Organization. Study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE). Geneva: WHO. 2006. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo....
63.
Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A. Citation data: their use as quantitative indicator for science and technology evaluation and policy-making. Sci Public Policy. 1992;19(5):321–327; doi: 10.1093/spp/19.5.321.
64.
González de Dios J, Aleixandre Benavent R. Evaluation of research in biomedicine and health sciences: bibliometric and cybermetric indicators [in Spanish]. Bol Pediatr. 2007;47:92–110.
65.
Long JC, Cunningham FC, Carswell P, Braithwaite J. Patterns of collaboration in complex networks: the example of a translational research network. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:225; doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-225.
66.
Rodríguez Rodríguez V, Rodríguez Mañas L, Sancho Castiello M, Díaz Martín R. Ageing: research in Spain and Europe [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2012;47(4):174–179.
67.
Fenning TM. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk. Nature. 2004;427(6973):393; doi: 10.1038/427393a.
68.
López-Muñoz F, Alamo C, Rubio G, García-García P, Martín-Agueda B, Cuenca E. Bibliometric analysis of biomedical publications on SSRI during 1980–2000. Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):95–103; doi: 10.1002/da.10121.
69.
Melero Fuentes D. Analysis of the scientific output on addictive substances in the Web of Science in the period of 2008–2012 [in Spanish]. Valencia: Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir; 2016.
70.
González Block MA. The state of international collaboration for health systems research: what do publications tell? Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:7; doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-7.
71.
Soteriades ES, Rosmarakis ES, Paraschakis K, Falagas ME. Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995–2002). FASEB J. 2006;20(1):29–34; doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4711lsf.
72.
Andrews K. National strategy for an ageing Australia. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2001. Available from: https://ifa.ngo/wp-content/upl... [March 2018].
73.
Pérez J, Abellán A. Ageing societies: a challenge for the 21st century [in Spanish]. Lychnos. 2010;2:46–51.
74.
Podestá O, Risso F. The role of physiotherapists among the elderly [in Spanish]. Rosario: Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud; 2009.
75.
Carmeli E. Physical therapy for neurological conditions in geriatric populations. Front Public Health. 2017;5:333; doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00333.
76.
Sundström G. Demography of aging in the Nordic countries. In: Uhlenberg P (ed.), International handbook of population aging. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009; 91–111.
77.
Davey A, Malmberg B, Sundström G. Aging in Sweden: local variation, local control. Gerontologist. 2014;54(4):525–532; doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt124.
78.
World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. 2020. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre... [March 2018].
79.
Borgman CL, Furner J. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annu Rev Inform Sci Technol. 2002;36(1):3–72; doi: 10.1002/aris.1440360102.
80.
Lewison G, Cottrell R, Dixon D. Bibliometric indicators to assist the peer review process in grant decisions. Res Eval. 1999;8(1):47–52; doi: 10.3152/147154499781777621.
81.
Sharma A, Singh HP, Kaur P, Gupta I. Impact factor: a tool to measure quality of research articles. Int J Appl Res Stud. 2013;2(6):1–4.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
