About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Reviewers
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Guide for reviewers
Our reviewers
ORIGINAL PAPER
Does training to sustain the paretic upper limb on an unstable surface provoke contraction of muscles around the shoulder in patients with hemiplegia? A pilot randomized controlled trial
1
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, India
2
International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, School of Health Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Submission date: 2021-06-11
Acceptance date: 2021-10-07
Publication date: 2022-09-26
Physiother Quart. 2023;31(3):41-45
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Activities with unstable supports provoke greater muscle contractions than those with stable surfaces. Using unstable surfaces to provoke upper limb muscle contraction after hemiplegia has not been explored. Hence, this study tested the effect of efforts to maintain the hemiparetic hand on an unstable surface on proximal muscle contractions of upper limb in patients with acute stroke.
Methods:
First-time stroke patients in the acute phase were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The control group (n = 18) received conventional physiotherapy, whilst the experimental group (n = 19) was given activities to maintain their hemiparetic side hand on an unstable surface in 5 different positions, in addition to conventional physiotherapy. Surface electromyogram was recorded from deltoid and upper trapezius on the hemiparetic side before and after 10 sessions of training.
Results:
Overall, 14 patients (aged 57.71 ± 10.70 years) in the control group and 14 (55.78 ± 7.52 years) in the experimental group completed the training. Non-parametric tests for between-group analysis showed that the average electromyography output in the deltoid and trapezius muscles was higher in the experimental group compared with the control group (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Training involving efforts to maintain the hemiparetic side hand on an unstable surface can be used to provoke activity in upper limb proximal muscles. This could be a simple training with minimal equipment and minimal manual assistance required, added to routine physiotherapy to facilitate proximal muscle contraction in patients with stroke during the acute phase.
Activities with unstable supports provoke greater muscle contractions than those with stable surfaces. Using unstable surfaces to provoke upper limb muscle contraction after hemiplegia has not been explored. Hence, this study tested the effect of efforts to maintain the hemiparetic hand on an unstable surface on proximal muscle contractions of upper limb in patients with acute stroke.
Methods:
First-time stroke patients in the acute phase were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The control group (n = 18) received conventional physiotherapy, whilst the experimental group (n = 19) was given activities to maintain their hemiparetic side hand on an unstable surface in 5 different positions, in addition to conventional physiotherapy. Surface electromyogram was recorded from deltoid and upper trapezius on the hemiparetic side before and after 10 sessions of training.
Results:
Overall, 14 patients (aged 57.71 ± 10.70 years) in the control group and 14 (55.78 ± 7.52 years) in the experimental group completed the training. Non-parametric tests for between-group analysis showed that the average electromyography output in the deltoid and trapezius muscles was higher in the experimental group compared with the control group (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Training involving efforts to maintain the hemiparetic side hand on an unstable surface can be used to provoke activity in upper limb proximal muscles. This could be a simple training with minimal equipment and minimal manual assistance required, added to routine physiotherapy to facilitate proximal muscle contraction in patients with stroke during the acute phase.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1279–1284; doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1279.
2.
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJH. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186; doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD.
3.
Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21(8):357–364; doi: 10.1080/096382899297459.
4.
Coupar F, Pollock A, Legg LA, Sackley C, van Vliet P. Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(5):CD006755; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006755.pub2.
5.
Wattchow KA, McDonnell MN, Hillier SL. Rehabilitation interventions for upper limb function in the first four weeks following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(2):367–382; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.014.
6.
Van Delden AEQ, Peper CE, Nienhuys KN, Zijp NI, Beek PJ, Kwakkel G. Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb training after stroke: the Upper Limb Training after Stroke clinical trial. Stroke. 2013;44(9):2613–2616; doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001969.
7.
Harris JE, Eng JJ. Strength training improves upper-limb function in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2010;41(1):136–140; doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.567438.
8.
Saikaley M, Pauli G, Iruthayarajah J, Mirkowski M, Iliescu A, Caughlin S, et al. Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. 10. Upper extremity interventions. Available from: http://www.ebrsr.com/evidence-....
9.
Abba MA, Muhammad AS, Badaru UM, Abdullahi A. Comparative effect of constraint-induced movement therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on upper limb function of chronic stroke survivors. Physiother Quart. 2020;28(1):1–5; doi: 10.5114/pq.2020.89809.
10.
Kim H, Lee G, Song C. Effect of functional electrical stimulation with mirror therapy on upper extremity motor function in poststroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(4):655–661; doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.06.017.
11.
Behm D, Colado Sanchez JC. The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(2):226–241.
12.
Imai A, Kaneoka K, Okubo Y, Shiina I, Tatsumura M, Izumi S, et al. Trunk muscle activity during lumbar stabilization exercises on both a stable and unstable surface. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(6):369–375; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3211.
13.
Karthikbabu S, Nayak A, Vijayakumar K, Misri Z, Suresh B, Ganesan S, et al. Comparison of physio ball and plinth trunk exercises regimens on trunk control and functional balance in patients with acute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(8):709–719; doi: 10.1177/0269215510397393.
14.
Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor relearning programme for stroke. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1990.
15.
Wickham J, Pizzari T, Stansfeld K, Burnside A, Watson L. Quantifying ‘normal’ shoulder muscle activity during abduction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010;20(2):212–222; doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.06.004.
16.
Blanc Y, Dimanico U. Electrode placement in surface electromyography (sEMG) “minimal crosstalk area” (MCA). Open Rehabil J. 2010;3(1):110–116; doi: 10.2174/1874943701003010110.
17.
Criswell E, Cram JR. Cram’s introduction to surface electromyography. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2011.
18.
Davies PM. Steps to follow: the comprehensive treatment of patients with hemiplegia, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2000.
19.
Saikaley M, Iruthayarajah J, Pauli G, Iliescu A, Wiener J, Cotoi A, et al. Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. 11. Hemiplegic shoulder pain and complex regional pain syndrome. Available from: http://www.ebrsr.com/evidence-....
20.
Miller KK, Porter RE, DeBaun-Sprague E, van Puymbroeck M, Schmid AA. Exercise after stroke: patient adherence and beliefs after discharge from rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(2):142–148; doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1200292.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
