About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Reviewers
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Guide for reviewers
Our reviewers
ORIGINAL PAPER
Effect of a vestibular-stimulating training program on motor skills in conjunction with cognitive aptitude of young school-aged children
1
Damanhour Medical National Institute, General Organization for Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, Ministry of Health, Damanhour, El-Buhayra, Egypt
2
Department of Physical Therapy for Paediatrics and Its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Pharos University,Alexandria, Egypt
3
Department of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
4
Psychology Department, Faculty of Arts, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
Submission date: 2020-12-31
Acceptance date: 2021-04-06
Publication date: 2023-08-30
Physiother Quart. 2023;31(3):65-79
KEYWORDS
physical activitymotor skillscognitive abilityvestibular systemMinds-in-MotionMazeschool-aged children
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The current study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the Minds-in-Motion Maze program on motor and cognitive abilities in school-aged children.
Methods:
The experimental design used was a randomised controlled trial. Participants, belonging to a public primary school, were 100 young children (50% boys) ranging from 6.00 to 8.50 years old (7.32 ± 0.82 years in average). They were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups (50 subjects/each), and two dropped out from each group. While the control group received unstructured physical activity, the children in the experimental group engaged in the Minds-in- Motion Maze vestibular stimulation program (24 weeks of a 30-minute structured PA on a daily basis). A pre- and post-test were conducted to evaluate the performance in motor skills and cognitive ability using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor ProficiencyTM Second Edition, complete form and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition.
Results:
The analysed data indicated that engaging in Minds-in-Motion Maze activities positively influenced the motor and cognitive abilities among the children. The between-group analysis exhibited strong significant improvement in the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.05), which did not show significant development. Boys outperformed girls on most tests, notably as age increased. The within-groups analysis (experimental group) demonstrated significant differences in the post-intervention gains of all motor and cognitive parameters (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Taken together, the current results reinforce causal evidence for the effects of Minds- in-Motion Maze based physical activity on improving both motor skills and cognitive aptitude in school-aged children.
The current study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the Minds-in-Motion Maze program on motor and cognitive abilities in school-aged children.
Methods:
The experimental design used was a randomised controlled trial. Participants, belonging to a public primary school, were 100 young children (50% boys) ranging from 6.00 to 8.50 years old (7.32 ± 0.82 years in average). They were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups (50 subjects/each), and two dropped out from each group. While the control group received unstructured physical activity, the children in the experimental group engaged in the Minds-in- Motion Maze vestibular stimulation program (24 weeks of a 30-minute structured PA on a daily basis). A pre- and post-test were conducted to evaluate the performance in motor skills and cognitive ability using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor ProficiencyTM Second Edition, complete form and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition.
Results:
The analysed data indicated that engaging in Minds-in-Motion Maze activities positively influenced the motor and cognitive abilities among the children. The between-group analysis exhibited strong significant improvement in the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.05), which did not show significant development. Boys outperformed girls on most tests, notably as age increased. The within-groups analysis (experimental group) demonstrated significant differences in the post-intervention gains of all motor and cognitive parameters (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Taken together, the current results reinforce causal evidence for the effects of Minds- in-Motion Maze based physical activity on improving both motor skills and cognitive aptitude in school-aged children.
REFERENCES (65)
1.
Darling-Churchill KE, Lippman L. Early childhood social and emotional development: advancing the field of measurement. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2016;45:1–7; doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.002.
2.
Yogman M, Garner A, Hutchinson J, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM, et al. The power of play: a pediatric role in enhancing development in young children. Pediatrics. 2018;142(3):e20182058; doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2058.
3.
Panahi S, Tremblay A. Sedentariness and health: sedentary behavior more than just physical inactivity? Front Public Health. 2018;6:258; doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00258.
4.
Rovo G, Makai A, Prémusz V, Baumann P, Laczkó T, Betlehem J, et al. Prevalence and correlates of physical activity among public healthcare workers in Hungary. Health Prob Civil. 2020;14(3):221–227; doi: 10.5114/hpc.2020.98469.
5.
Telama R. Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a review. Obes Facts. 2009;2(3):187–95; doi: 10.1159/000222244.
6.
Barnett LM, Beurden VE, Morgan PJ, Brooks LO, Beard JR. Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44(3):252–259; doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.07.004.
7.
Bodnar I, Pavlova I, Khamade A. Physical education of children with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review of structure and effects of interventional programs. Physiother Quart. 2020;28(4):61–70; doi: 10.5114/pq.2020.96232.
8.
Kubińska Z, Zaworski K, Mysula I, Pocztarska-Głos, A. Physical activity in primary and secondary physioprophylaxis. Health Prob Civil. 2020;14(1):34–42; doi: 10.5114/hpc.2020.92522.
9.
Damasceno VO, Lima JRP, Gonçalves R, Vianna JM, Werneck FZ, Amorim PR, et al. Concurrent validity and reliability of 3-Day Physical Activity Recall on daily energy expenditure in children and adolescents. Hum Mov. 2021;22(2):93–101; doi: 10.5114/hm.2021.100018.
10.
Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174(6):801–809; doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351.
11.
Archer T. Physical exercise and its impact on psychology. Clin Exp Sychol. 2016; 2:e104; doi: 10.4172/2471-2701.1000e104.
12.
dos Santos CR, da Silva CC, Marques I. Relationship between physical activity, physical fitness, and motor competence in school children. Motricidade. 2017;13(S1):76–83.
13.
Morris T, Roychowdhury D. Physical activity for health and wellbeing: the role of motives for participation. Health Psychol Rep. 2020;8(4):391–407; doi: 10.5114/hpr.2020.100111.
14.
Tilp M, Scharf C, Payer G, Presker M, Fink A. Physical exercise during the morning school-break improves basic cognitive functions. Mind Brain Educ. 2020;14(1):24–31; doi: 10.1111/mbe.12228.
15.
Tong L, Shen H, Perreau VM, Balazs R, Cotman CW. Effects of exercise on gene-expression profile in the rat hippocampus. Neurobiol Dis. 2001;8(6):1046–1056; doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0427.
16.
Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol 2012;2(2):1143–1211; doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110025.
18.
Ali A, Pigou D, Clarke L, McLachlan CJ. Literature review on motor skill and physical activity in preschool children in New Zealand. Adv Phys Educ. 2017;7(1):10–26; doi: 10.4236/ape.2017.71002.
19.
Khodaverdi Z, Bahram A, Khalaji H, Kazemnejad, A. Motor skill competence and perceived motor competence: which best predicts physical activity among girls? Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(10):1145–1150.
20.
Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA, Rudisill ME, Garcia C, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest. 2008;60(2):290–306; doi: 10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582.
21.
Wrotniak BH, Epstein LH, Dorn JM, Jones KE, Kondilis VA. The relationship between motor proficiency and physical activity in children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):1758–1765; doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0742.
22.
Williams HG, Pfeiffer KA, O’Neill JR, Dowda M, McIver KL, Brown WH, et al. Motor skill performance and physical activity in preschool children. Obesity. 2008;16:1421–1426; doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.214.
23.
Webster EK, Martin CK, Staiano AE. Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(2):114–121; doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.11.006.
24.
Schmutz EA, Leeger-Aschmann CS, Kakebeeke TH, Zysset AE, Messerli-Bürgy N, Stülb, K, et al. Motor competence and physical activity in early childhood: stability and relationship. Front Public Health. 2020;8:39; doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00039.
25.
Robinson LE, Stodden DF, Barnett LM, Lopes VP, Logan SW, Rodrigues LP, et al. Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1273–1284; doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0351-6.
26.
Darling-Hammond L, Flook L, Cook-Harvey C, Barron B, Osher D. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Appl Dev Sci. 2020;24(2):97–140; doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
27.
Johnson MH. Interactive specialization: a domain-general framework for human functional brain development? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011;1(1):7–21; doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.003.
28.
Miranda M, Morici JF, Zanoni MB, Bekinschtein P. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a key molecule for memory in the healthy and the pathological brain. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:363; doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00363.
29.
Nilsson J, Ekblom Ö, Ekblom M, Lebedev A, Tarassova O, Moberg M, et al. Acute increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor in plasma following physical exercise relates to subsequent learning in older adults. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4395; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60124-0.
30.
Nelson 3rd CA, Zeanah CH, Fox NA. How early experience shapes human development: the case of psychosocial deprivation. Neural Plast. 2019;2019: 1676285; doi: 10.1155/2019/1676285.
31.
Audiffren M, André N. The exercise-cognition relationship: a virtuous circle. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(4):339–347; doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.03.001.
32.
Mitts M. Effect of Sensory Stimulation in Physical Activity on Academic Achievement and Classroom Behavior in Elementary Students. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas; 2018. Available DATE?? from: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/....
33.
Vargas L. The effects of a physical activity program called “minds-in-motion-the maze” on balance and motor skills in middle school aged students. Electronic Theses and Dissertation. Kentucky: University of Louisville; 2018; doi: 10.18297/etd/2988.
34.
Meyer CS. Minds-in-Motion: the Maze Handbook. Louisville: Minds-in-Motion Inc. Press; 2012.
35.
Bruininks RH, Bruininks BD. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson; 2005.
36.
Ferreira L, Vieira JL, da Rocha FF, da Silva PN, Cheuczuk F, Caçola P, et al. Percentile curves for Brazilian children evaluated with the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency, 2nd edition. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2020;22(1):e65027; doi: 10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e65027.
37.
Wechsler D. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. 4th ed. London: Pearson, 2003.
38.
Plante TG. Contemporary Clinical Psychology. Hoboken–New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
39.
Davis EE, Pitchford NJ, Limback E. The interrelation between cognitive and motor development in typically developing children aged 4–11 years is underpinned by visual processing and fine manual control. Br J Psychol. 2011;102:569–584; doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02018.x.
40.
Zeng N, Ayyub M, Sun H, Wen X, Xiang P, Gao, Z. Effects of physical activity on motor skills and cognitive development in early childhood: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2760716; doi: 10.1155/2017/2760716.
41.
Reilly DS, van Donkelaar P, Saavedra S, Woollacott MH. Interaction between the development of postural control and the executive function of attention. J Motor Behav. 2008;40(2):90–102; doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.2.90-102.
42.
Carter K, Sunderman S, Burnett SW. The Effect of vestibular stimulation exercises on balance, coordination, and agility in children with Down syndrome. Am J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2018;6(2):28–32; doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20180602.11.
43.
Vidoni C, Lorenz DJ, de Paleville DT. Incorporating a movement skill programme into a preschool daily schedule. Early Child Dev Care. 2014;184(8):1211–1222; doi: 10.1080/03004430.2013.856895.
44.
Yamada C, Itaguchi Y, Fukuzawa K. Effects of the amount of practice and time interval between practice sessions on the retention of internal models. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215331; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215331.
45.
Ehrlich DE, Schoppik D. A primal role for the vestibular sense in the development of coordinated locomotion. Elife. 2019;8:e45839; doi: 10.7554/eLife.45839.
46.
Bakke HA, Cavalcante WA, de Oliveira IS, Sarinho SW, Cattuzzo MT. Assessment of motor skills in children with visual impairment: a systematic and integrative review. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2019;13:1179556519838287; doi: 10.1177/1179556519838287.
47.
Arendt RE, MacLean WE Jr, Halpern LF, Youngquist GA, Baumeister AA. The influence of rotary vestibular stimulation upon motor development of nonhandicapped and down syndrome infants. Res Dev Disabil. 1991;12(3):333–348; doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(91)90016-L.
48.
Popović B, Gušić M, Radanović D, Andrašić S, Madić DM, Mačak D, et al. Evaluation of gross motor coordination and physical fitness in children: comparison between soccer and multisport activities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5902; doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165902.
49.
Best JR. Effects of physical activity on children’s executive function: contributions of experimental research on aerobic exercise. Dev Rev. 2010;30(4):331–551; doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2010.08.001.
50.
Donnelly JE, Hillman CH, Castelli D, Etnier JL, Lee S, Tomporowski P, et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(6):1197–1222; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000901.
51.
Erickson KI, Raji CA, Lopez OL, Becker JT, Rosano C, Newman AB, et al. Physical activity predicts gray matter volume in late adulthood: the cardiovascular health study. Neurology. 2010;75(6):1415–1422; doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0427.
52.
Tian Q, Erickson KI, Simonsick EM, Aizenstein HJ, Glynn NW, Boudreau RM, et al. Physical activity predicts microstructural integrity in memory-related networks in very old adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(10):1284–1290; doi: 101093/Gerona/glt287.
53.
Costello K, Warne J. A four-week fundamental motor skill intervention improves motor skills in eight to 10-year-old Irish primary school children. Cogent Soc Sci. 2020;6(1):1724065; doi: 10.1080/23311886.2020.1724065.
54.
Lorås H. The effects of physical education on motor competence in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports. 2020;8(6):88; doi: 10.3390/sports8060088.
55.
Raposa B, Melczer C, Rozmann N, Károlyi T, Takacs G, Doma V, et al. Investigation of physical activity and sports consumption habits in university students. Health Prob Civil. 2020;14(3):211–220; doi: 10.5114/hpc.2020.97897.
56.
Junaid KA, Fellowes S. Gender differences in the attainment of motor skills on the movement assessment battery for children. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2006;26(1–2):5–11; doi: 10.1080/J006v26n01_02.
57.
Kokštejn J, Musálek M, Tufano JJ. Are sex differences in fundamental motor skills uniform throughout the entire preschool period? PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176556; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176556.
58.
Thomas JR, French KE. Gender differences across age in motor performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):260–282; doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.260.
59.
Dodig IP, Krišto D, Kalcina LL, Pecotić R, Valić M, Đogaš, Z. The effect of age and gender on cognitive and psychomotor abilities measured by computerized series tests: a cross-sectional study. Croat Med J. 2020;61(2):82–92; doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.82.
60.
Liu Y, Zhi M, Li X. Parental age and characteristics of the offspring. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(1):115–123; doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.004.
61.
Spruijt S, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B. Current insights in the development of children’s motor imagery ability. Front Psychol. 2015;6:787; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00787.
62.
Greier K, Drenowatz C, Ruedl, G, Kirschner W, Lackner C, Feurstein-Zerlauth V, et al. Motor competence across 6- to 10-year old children: a cross-sectional study in 1811 elementary school students. J Health Sci Educ. 2019;3(3):1–6; doi: 10.0000/JHSE.1000162.
63.
Lima RA, Bugge A, Ersbøll AK, Stodden DF, Andersen LB. The longitudinal relationship between motor competence and measures of fatness and fitness from childhood into adolescence [in Portuguese]. J Pediatr. 2019;95(4):482–488; doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2018.02.010.
64.
Peng P, Kievit RA. The development of academic achievement and cognitive abilities: a bidirectional perspective. Child Dev Perspect. 2020;14(1):15–20; doi: 10.1111/cdep.12352.
65.
Abdelkarim O, Ammar A, Chtourou H, Wagnerd M, Knisel E, Hökelmann A, et al. Relationship between motor and cognitive learning abilities among primary school-aged children. Alex J Med. 2017;53(4):325–331; doi: 10.1016/j.ajme.2016.12.004.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
