ORIGINAL PAPER
Correlation of foot posture with balance and pelvic tilt in healthy runners
More details
Hide details
1
Srinivas College of Physiotherapy and Research Centre, Mangalore, India
2
Centre for Diabetic Foot Care and Research, Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
Submission date: 2020-04-22
Acceptance date: 2020-06-15
Publication date: 2021-11-24
Physiother Quart. 2021;29(4):18-21
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The purpose of the study was to find out the relationship of hyper-pronated foot with anterior pelvic tilt and dynamic balance in recreational runners. Hyper-pronated foot is a functional deformity which mainly affects the total body kinematic chain during dynamic weight-bearing events such as running when the foot lands on the ground. Furthermore, individuals with hyper-pronated foot may exhibit anterior pelvic tilt owing to the biomechanical relations, which alters balance as well. Runners with hyper-pronated feet are at high risk of injury, possibly because of larger torque generated at the lower limb.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted in 55 healthy recreational runners with hyper-pronated foot aged 19–30 years. They were assessed by foot posture index for hyper-pronated foot, Star Excursion Balance Test for dynamic balance evaluation, and the photogrammetry method to determine the anterior pelvic tilt angle.
Results:
The results revealed a poor correlation between foot posture index and dynamic body balance (r = 0.23) and a moderate correlation between foot posture index and anterior pelvic tilt angle (r = 0.47).
Conclusions:
There was no significant correlation of foot posture index with dynamic body balance, whereas a minimal correlation was found between foot posture index and the anterior pelvic tilt angle. Therefore, hyper-pronated foot does not significantly directly influence balance or posture.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Ferber R, Hreljac A, Kendall KD. Suspected mechanisms in the cause of overuse running injuries: a clinical review. Sports Health. 2009;1(3):242–246; doi: 10.1177/1941738109334272.
2.
Dugan SA, Bhat KP. Biomechanics and analysis of running gait. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16(3):603–621; doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.02.007.
3.
Hetsroni I, Finestone A, Milgrom C, Sira DB, Nyska M, Radeva-Petrova D, et al. A prospective biomechanical study of the association between foot pronation and the incidence of anterior knee pain among military recruits. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(7):905–908; doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17826.
4.
Pohl MB, Buckley JG. Changes in foot and shank coupling due to alterations in foot strike pattern during running. Clin Biomech. 2008;23(3):334–341; doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.016.
5.
Ribeiro AP, Trombini-Souza F, Tessutti V, Rodrigues Lima F, de Camargo Neves Sacco I, Amado João SM. Rearfoot alignment and medial longitudinal arch configurations of runners with symptoms and histories of plantar fasciitis. Clinics. 2011;66(6):1027–1033; doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000600018.
6.
Dias Lopes A, Hespanhol LC Júnior, Yeung SS, Oliveira Pena Costa L. What are the main running-related musculoskeletal injuries? A systematic review. Sports Med. 2012;42(10):891–905; doi: 10.1007/BF03262301.
7.
D’Andréa Greve JM, Ferrari Bechara Andere N, Silva Luna NM, Canonica AC, da Cruz TMF, Peterson M, et al. Risk factors for overuse injuries in runners’ ankles: a literature review. MedicalExpress. 2015;2(3):M150301; doi: 10.5935/MedicalExpress.2015.03.01.
8.
Balouchy R. Comparative analysis of lower limb alignments in healthy subjects and subjects with back pain. Ann Appl Sport Sci. 2015;3(2):33–42; doi: 10.18869/ACADPUB.AASSJOURNAL.3.2.33.
9.
Menz HB, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, Hillstrom HJ, Hannan MT. Foot posture, foot function and low back pain: the Framingham Foot Study. Rheumatology. 2013;52(12):2275–2282; doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket298.
10.
Hamel AJ, Sharkey NA, Buczek FL, Michelson J. Relative motions of the tibia, talus, and calcaneus during the stance phase of gait: a cadaver study. Gait Posture. 2004;20(2):147–153; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.07.003.
11.
Souza TR, Pinto RZ, Trede RG, Kirkwood RN, Fonseca ST. Temporal couplings between rearfoot-shank complex and hip joint during walking. Clin Biomech. 2010;25(7):745–748; doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.012.
12.
Hedayati R, Hojati Shargh M, Soltani T, Saeb M, Ghorbani R, Hajihasani A. The relation between clinical measurements of plantar characteristics and static and dynamic balance indices. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2014;1(2):e24269; doi: 10.17795/mejrh-24269.
13.
McGuine TA, Greene JJ, Best T, Leverson G. Balance as a predictor of ankle injuries in high school basketball players. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10(4):239–244; doi: 10.1097/00042752-200010000-00003.
14.
Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The sensorimotor system, part II: The role of proprioception in motor control and functional joint stability. J Athl Train. 2002;37(1):80–84.
15.
Anzai E, Nakajima K, Iwakami Y, Sato M, Ino S, Ifukube T, et al. Effects of foot arch structure on postural stability. Clin Res Foot Ankle. 2014;2:132; doi: 10.4172/2329-910X.1000133.
16.
Hollander K, Zech A, Rahlf AL, Orendurff MS, Stebbins J, Heidt C. The relationship between static and dynamic foot posture and running biomechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2019;72:109–122; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.031.
17.
Lubetzky VA, Kramer AP. The association between foot morphology and dynamic balance performance as measured by the Star Excursion Balance Test. J Exerc Sports Orthop. 2015;2(3):1–7; doi: 10.15226/2374-6904/2/3/00132.
18.
Karthikeyan G, Jadav Jayraj S, Narayanan V. Effect of forefoot type on postural stability – a cross sectional comparative study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(2):213–224.
19.
Tsai L-C, Yu B, Mercer VS, Gross MT. Comparison of different structural foot types for measures of standing postural control. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):942–953; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2336.
20.
Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005;40(1):41–46.
21.
Khamis S, Yizhar Z. Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignment in a standing position. Gait Posture. 2007;25(1):127–134; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.005.
22.
Terada M, Wittwer AM, Gribble PA. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the five image-based criteria of the foot posture index-6. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(2):187–194.
23.
Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the foot posture index. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(1):89–98; doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002.
24.
Gribble PA, Hertel J, Pilsky P. Using the Star Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. J Athl Train. 2012;47(3):339–357; doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.08.
25.
Bulow A, Anderson JE, Leiter JR, MacDonald PB, Peeler J. The modified Star Excursion Balance and Y-Balance Test results differ when assessing physically active healthy adolescent females. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019;14(2):192–203; doi: 10.26603/ijspt20190192.
26.
Helmy NA, Sayyad MM, Kattabei OM. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of Surgimap Spine software for measuring spinal postural angles from digital photographs. Bull Fac Phys Ther. 2015;20:193–199; doi: 10.4103/1110-6611.174719.
27.
Al Abdulwahab SS, Kachanathu SJ. The effect of various degrees of foot posture on standing balance in a healthy adult population. Somatosens Mot Res. 2015;32(2):172–176; doi: 10.3109/08990220.2015.1029608.