ORIGINAL PAPER
Effect of kinesiotaping on subtalar evertor and invertor muscle strength in healthy individuals
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Biomechanics, Faulty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
 
 
Submission date: 2021-09-21
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-01-18
 
 
Publication date: 2022-09-26
 
 
Physiother Quart. 2023;31(3):94-100
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
To date, no study examined the effect of ankle kinesiotaping on eccentric versus concentric subtalar evertor and invertor strength nor compared its effect between evertors and invertors. This study examined the effect of kinesiotaping on peak subtalar evertor and invertor eccentric and concentric torques assessed at 120º/sec. Eccentric versus concentric torque in both muscle groups as well as evertor versus invertor torque at both modes of muscle contraction were examined.

Methods:
A group of 30 healthy individuals (24 males and 6 females) with mean age 21 ± 2.73 years, height 1.73 ± 0.08 m, and weight 75 ± 6.20 kg were tested. They were randomly tested with kinesiotape use and without. The kinesiotape was applied on the tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, peroneus longus and peroneus brevis muscles. The peak torques were assessed using a Biodex isokinetic dynamometer.

Results:
2×2×2 Repeated Measure ANOVA revealed that the peak torque was significantly higher with kinesiotape use compared with no tape for both eccentric and concentric evertors, and eccentric invertors (p ≤ 0.009). The eccentric peak torque was significantly higher than the concentric for both evertors and invertors with kinesiotape use, and evertors with no tape (p ≤ 0.001). Finally, the invertor concentric torque was significantly higher than the evertor torque with no tape use (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:
Ankle kinesiotaping improves both evertor and invertor torques with the eccentric torque being significantly improved compared with the concentric. No significant effect on evertors versus invertors was found. This suggests kinesiotape use for managing musculoskeletal disorders caused by impaired subtalar muscle strength as lateral ankle sprains.

 
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Lees A, Asai T, Andersen TB, Nunome H, Sterzing T. The biomechanics of kicking in soccer: a review. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(8):805–817; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.481305.
 
2.
Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping® Method. Tokyo: Ken lkai; 2003.
 
3.
Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K. Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries: a meta-analysis of the evidence for its effectiveness. Sports Med. 2012;42(2):153–164; doi: 10.2165/11594960-000000000-00000.
 
4.
Murray H. Kinesio Taping®, muscle strength and ROM after ACL repair. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(1):A-14.
 
5.
Osterhues DJ. The use of Kinesio Taping® in the management of traumatic patella dislocation. A case study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2004;20:267–270; doi: 10.1080/09593980490888370.
 
6.
Neumann DADA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2016.
 
7.
Kaminski TW, Hartsell HD. Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability: a strength prespective. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):394–405.
 
8.
Abdel-aziem AA, Draz AH. Chronic ankle instability alters eccentric eversion/inversion and dorsiflexion/plantarflexion ratio. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(1):47–53; doi: 10.3233/BMR-130418.
 
9.
David P, Halimi M, Mora I, Doutrellot P-L, Petitjean M. Isokinetic testing of evertor and invertor muscles in patients with chronic ankle instability. J Appl Biomech. 2013;29(6):696–704; doi: 10.1123/jab.29.6.696.
 
10.
Goharpey Sh, Sadeghi M, Maroufi N, Shaterzadeh Mj. Comparison of invertor and evertor muscle strength in patients with chronic functional ankle instability. J Med Sci. 2007;7(4):674–677; doi: 10.3923/jms.2007.674.677.
 
11.
Willems T, Witvrouw E, Verstuyft J, Vaes P, De Clercq D. Proprioception and muscle strength in subjects with a history of ankle sprains and chronic instability. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):487–493.
 
12.
Csapo R, Alegre LM. Effects of Kinesio® taping on skeletal muscle strength – a meta-analysis of current evidence. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(4):450–456; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.06.014.
 
13.
Vercelli S, Sartorio F, Foti C, Colletto L, Virton D, Ronconi G, et al. Immediate effects of kinesiotaping on quadriceps muscle strength: a single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(4):319–326; doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31824c835d.
 
14.
Choi I-R, Lee J-H. Effect of kinesiology tape application direction on quadriceps strength. Medicine. 2018;97(24):e11038; doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011038.
 
15.
Vithoulka I, Beneka A, Malliou P, Aggelousis N, Karatsolis K, Diamantopoulos K. The effects of Kinesio-Taping® on quadriceps strength during isokinetic exercise in healthy non athlete women. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2010;18(1):1–6; doi: 10.3233/IES-2010-0352.
 
16.
Yam ML, Yang Z, Zee BC-Y, Chong KC. Effects of Kinesio tape on lower limb muscle strength, hop test, and vertical jump performances: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):212; doi:10.1186/12891-019-2564-6.
 
17.
Simon J, Garcia W, Docherty CL. The effect of Kinesio tape on force sense in people with functional ankle instability. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24(4):289–294; doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000030.
 
18.
Huang C-Y, Hsieh T-H, Lu S-C, Su F-C. Effect of Kinesio tape to muscle activity and vertical jump performance in healthy inactive people. Biomed Eng Online. 2011;10:70; doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-70.
 
19.
Bicici S, Karatas N, Baltaci G. Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(2):154–166.
 
20.
Hong S, Lee E-H, Eom H-R, Yeom C-K, Park S-Y, Jeong Y-B, et al. Effect of ankle taping on the ankle muscle strength in young healthy women. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2020;15(2):470–475; doi: 10.14198/jhse.2020.152.20.
 
21.
Aly G, El-Hafez S, Nassif N. Effect of Kinesio taping on isokinetic parameters of ankle joint. Int J Curr Res. 2017;9(4):49299–49307.
 
22.
Fox J, Docherty CL, Schrader J, Applegate T. Eccentric planter-flexor torque deficits in participants with functional ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008;43(1):51–54; doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.1.51.
 
23.
Porter GK Jr, Kaminski TW, Hatzel B, Powers ME, Horodyski MB. An examination of the stretch-shortening cycle of the dorsiflexors and evertors in uninjured and functionally unstable ankles. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):494–500.
 
24.
Svantesson U, Ernstoff B, Bergh P, Grimby G. Use of a Kin-Com dynamometer to study the stretch-shortening cycle during plantar flexion. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;62(6):415–419; doi: 10.1007/BF00626613.
 
25.
Huxley AF. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318.
 
26.
Herzog W. Why are muscles strong, and do they require little energy in eccentric action? J Sport Health Sci. 2018;7(3):255–264; doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.05.005.
 
27.
Edman KA, Elzinga G, Noble MI. Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1982;80(5):769–784; doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.5.769.
 
28.
Herzog W, Leonard TR. Force enhancement following stretching of skeletal muscle a new mechanism. J Exp Biol. 2002;205(9):1275–1283; doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.9.1275.
 
29.
De Freitas FS, Brown LE, Gomes WA, Behm DG, Marchetti PH. No effect of kinesiololgy tape on passive tension, strength or quadriceps muscle activation of during maximal voluntary isometric contraction in resistance trained men. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018;13(4):661–667; doi: 10.26603/ijspt20180661.
 
30.
Collado H, Coudreuse JM, Graziani F, Bensoussan L, Viton JM, Delarque A. Eccentric reinforcement of the ankle evertor muscles after lateral ankle sprain. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(2):241–246; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00882.x.
 
31.
Munn J, Beard DJ, Refshauge KM, Lee RY. Eccentric muscle strength in functional ankle instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(2):245–250; doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048724.74659.9F.
 
32.
Dolphin M, Brooks G, Calancie B, Rufa A. Does the direction of kinesiology tape application influence muscle activation in asymptomatic individuals? Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021;16(1):135–144; doi: 10.26603/001c.18799.
 
33.
Fukui T, Otake Y, Kondo T. The effects of new taping methods designed to increase muscle strength. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(1):70–74; doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.70.
 
34.
Guner S, Alsancak S, Koz M. Effect of two different kinesio taping techniques on knee kinematics and kinetics in young females. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(10):3093–3096; doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3093.
 
35.
Kuo Y-L, Huang Y-C. Effects of the application direction of Kinesio taping on isometric muscle strength of the wrist and fingers of healthy adults – a pilot study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(3):287–291; doi: 10.1589/JPTS.25.287.
 
36.
Yeung SS, Yeung EW. Acute effects of kinesio taping on knee extensor peak torque and stretch reflex in healthy adults. Medicine. 2016;95(4):e2615; doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002615.
 
37.
Konishi Y. Tactile stimulation with kinesiology tape alleviates muscle weakness attributable to attenuation of Ia afferents. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(1):45–48; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.04.007.
 
38.
Barros LAN, Ferrari-Piloni C, Torres EM, Estrela E, Valla­dares-Neto J. Effect size: a statistical basis for clinical practice. Rev Odonto Cienc. 2018;33(1):84–90; doi: 10.15448/1980-6523.2018.1.29437.
 
39.
Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Friederich JA. The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. J Biomech. 1986;19(8)589–596; doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(86)90164-8.
 
40.
Gans C. Fiber architecture and muscle function. Exerc Sports Sci Rev. 1982;10:160–207; doi: 10.1249/00003677-198201000-00006.
 
41.
Oatis CA. Kinesiology: The Mechanics and Pathomechanics of Human Movement. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
 
42.
Wong DLK, Glasheen-Way M, Andrews LF. Isokinetic evaluation of the ankle invertors and evertors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1984;5(5):246–252; doi: 10.2519/jospt.1984.5.5.246.
 
eISSN:2544-4395
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top