About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Ethics in publishing
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Our reviewers
Ethics in publishing
Guide for reviewers
Books and Events
Books
Events
ORIGINAL PAPER
Effect of retro-walking on pain, functional disability, quality of life and sleep problems in patients with chronic low back pain
1
Centre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jamia Millia Slamia, New Delhi, India
Submission date: 2020-06-05
Acceptance date: 2021-04-13
Publication date: 2023-06-01
Physiother Quart. 2023;31(3):86-93
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Chronic low back pain is an important clinical, social, economic, and public health problem, with low treatment success rates. Retro-walking works on multiple factors of the causative agents of low back pain. Therefore the aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of retro-walking on pain, functional disability, quality of life and sleep problems in patients with chronic low back pain.
Methods:
It was a two parallel arm, single blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Thirty-one patients both males and females with chronic low back pain were recruited from December 2016 till April 2017 out of which twenty-nine completed the study. The experimental group had 16 patients (aged 24.7 ± 5.56 with 22.7 ± 4.28 Body Mass Index) whereas the control group had 15 patients (aged 25.9 ± 5.61with and 22.1 ± 3.15 Body Mass Index). Pain, Functional Disability, Quality of Life and Sleep Problems were measured by Numerical pain rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form Health Survey 36 and sleep diary Both the groups received same conventional treatment for three physiotherapy sessions per week for three weeks. Experimental group additionally participated in 15 minutes of retro-walking at the comfortable walking speed which was determined prior to the commencement of the intervention along with the conventional treatment.
Results:
All variables of the sleep diary, i.e., sleeping hours/week [Time effect (p = 0.004), time × group interaction effect (p = 0.001)], sleep efficiency [Time effect (p = 0.024), time × group interaction effect (p = 0.004)] and restoration post sleep [Time effect (p = 0.014), time × group interaction effect (p = 0.034)] showed significant differences in the experimental group. The experimental group also demonstrated significant differences over time (p = 0.001) in all the other outcome measures such as pain, pain disability, quality of life and sleep patterns and habits.
Conclusions:
Conventional physiotherapy is an effective means of treatment for Chronic Low back pain. However, there was a added advantage of retro-walking as the experimental group showed a faster recovery. Thus, making it an effective treatment adjunct.
Chronic low back pain is an important clinical, social, economic, and public health problem, with low treatment success rates. Retro-walking works on multiple factors of the causative agents of low back pain. Therefore the aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of retro-walking on pain, functional disability, quality of life and sleep problems in patients with chronic low back pain.
Methods:
It was a two parallel arm, single blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Thirty-one patients both males and females with chronic low back pain were recruited from December 2016 till April 2017 out of which twenty-nine completed the study. The experimental group had 16 patients (aged 24.7 ± 5.56 with 22.7 ± 4.28 Body Mass Index) whereas the control group had 15 patients (aged 25.9 ± 5.61with and 22.1 ± 3.15 Body Mass Index). Pain, Functional Disability, Quality of Life and Sleep Problems were measured by Numerical pain rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form Health Survey 36 and sleep diary Both the groups received same conventional treatment for three physiotherapy sessions per week for three weeks. Experimental group additionally participated in 15 minutes of retro-walking at the comfortable walking speed which was determined prior to the commencement of the intervention along with the conventional treatment.
Results:
All variables of the sleep diary, i.e., sleeping hours/week [Time effect (p = 0.004), time × group interaction effect (p = 0.001)], sleep efficiency [Time effect (p = 0.024), time × group interaction effect (p = 0.004)] and restoration post sleep [Time effect (p = 0.014), time × group interaction effect (p = 0.034)] showed significant differences in the experimental group. The experimental group also demonstrated significant differences over time (p = 0.001) in all the other outcome measures such as pain, pain disability, quality of life and sleep patterns and habits.
Conclusions:
Conventional physiotherapy is an effective means of treatment for Chronic Low back pain. However, there was a added advantage of retro-walking as the experimental group showed a faster recovery. Thus, making it an effective treatment adjunct.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Datta S, Cohen SP, Hirsch JA, et al. Comprehensive review of epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain. Pain Phys. 2009;12(4),35–70.
2.
Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, et al. COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl. 2):192–300; doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1.
3.
Bindra S, Sinha AGK, Benjamin AI. Epidemiology of low back pain in Indian population: a review. Int J Basic Appl Med Sci. 2015;5(1):166–179.
4.
Husky MM, Farin FF, Compagnone P, Fermanian C, Kovess-Masfety V. Chronic back pain and its association with quality of life in a large French population survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):195; doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1018-4.
5.
Rives PA, Douglass AB. Evaluation and treatment of low back pain in family practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(Suppl 1):23–31.
6.
The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403–1409; doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k.
7.
Cvijetic S, Bobic J, Grazio S, Uremovic M, Nemcic T, Krapac L. Quality of life, personality and use of pain medication in patients with chronic back pain. Appl Res Qual Life. 2014;9(2):401–411; doi: 10.1007/s11482-013-9219-9.
8.
Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, Chuter V. Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(12):1155–1167; doi: 10.1177/0269215515570379.
9.
Siegel JM. Sleep viewed as a state of adaptive inactivity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(10):747–753; doi: 10.1038/nrn2697.
10.
Marin R, Cyhan T, Miklos W. Sleep disturbance in patients with chronic low back pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(5):430–435; doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000214259.06380.79.
11.
Kaila-Kangas L, Kivimäki M, Härmä M, Riihimäki H, Luukkonen R, Kirjonen J, et al. Sleep disturbances as predictors of hospitalization for back disorders – a 28-year follow-up of industrial employees. Spine. 2006;31(1):51–56; doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000193902.45315.e5.
12.
Kelly GA, Blake C, Power CK, O’Keeffe D, Fullen BM. The association between chronic low back pain and sleep: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(2):169–181; doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f3bdd5.
13.
Eadie J, van de Water AT, Lonsdale C, Tully MA, van Mechelen W, Boreham CA, et al. Physiotherapy for sleep disturbance in people with chronic low back pain: results of a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2083–2092; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.017.
14.
Dagenais S, Tricco AC, Haldeman S. Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines. Spine J. 2010;10(6):514–529; doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.032.
15.
May S. Self-management of chronic low back pain and osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(4):199; doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.26.
16.
Rainville J, Hartigan C, Martinez E, Limke J, Jouve C, Finno M. Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2004;4(1):106–115; doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00174-8.
17.
Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368–2383; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6.
18.
Last AR, Hulbert K. Chronic low back pain: evaluation and management: CPD. S Afr Fam Pract. 2010;52(3):184–192.
19.
Joshi S, Vij JS, Singh SK. Retrowalking: a new concept in physiotherapy and rehabilitation. Int J Sci Res. 2016;4(10):152–156.
20.
Hoogkamer W, Meyns P, Duysens J. Steps forward in understanding backward gait: from basic circuits to rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2014;42(1):23–29; doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000000.
21.
Lee M, Kim J, Son J, Kim Y. Kinematic and kinetic analysis during forward and backward walking. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):674–678; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.02.014.
22.
Son H-H. The effects of stabilization exercise with abdominal breath on balance and Oswestry disability index for low back pain patients. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2015;10(1):107–113; doi: 10.13066/kspm.2015.10.1.107.
23.
Rickham PP. Human experimentation. Code of ethics of the world medical association. Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J. 1964;2(5402):177–177; doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5402.177.
24.
Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo N. Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures – A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
25.
Good M, Stiller C, Zauszniewski JA, Anderson GC, Stanton-Hicks M, Grass JA. Sensation and distress of pain scales: reliability, validity, and sensitivity. J Nurs Meas. 2001;9(3):219–38; doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.9.3.219.
26.
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–2953; doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
27.
Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25(24):3115–3124; doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006.
28.
Lee C-P, Fu T-S, Liu C-Y, Hung C-I. Psychometric evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index in patients with chronic low back pain: factor and Mokken analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):192; doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0768-8.
29.
Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
30.
Corrcoran WE, Durham CF. Quality of life as an outcome-based evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft critical paths using the SF-36. Qual Manag Health Care. 2000;8(2):72–81; doi: 10.1097/00019514-200008020-00008.
31.
Buysse DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Lichstein KL, Morin CM. Recommendations for a standard research assessment of insomnia. Sleep. 2006;29(9):1155–1173; doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.9.1155.
32.
Rogers AE, Caruso CC, Aldrich MS. Reliability of sleep diaries for assessment of sleep/wake patterns. Nurs Res. 1993;42(6):368–372.
33.
Cairns MC, Foster NE, Wright C. Randomized controlled trial of specific spinal stabilization exercises and conventional physiotherapy for recurrent low back pain. Spine. 2006;31(19):670–681; doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000232787.71938.5d.
34.
Aure OF, Nilsen JH, Vasseljen O. Manual therapy and exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine. 2003;28(6):525–531; doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049921.04200.A6.
35.
Rittweger J, Just K, Kautzsch K, Reeg P, Felsenberg D. Treatment of chronic lower back pain with lumbar extension and whole-body vibration exercise: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2002;27(17):1829–1834; doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00003.
36.
Phalen GS, Dickson JA. Spondylolisthesis and tight hamstrings. J Bone Joint Surg. 1961;43(4):505–512; doi: 10.2106/00004623-196143040-00005.
37.
Bono CM. Low-back pain in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(2):382–396; doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00027.
38.
Whitley CR, Dufek JS. Effects of backward walking on hamstring flexibility and low back range of motion. Int J Exerc Sci. 2011;4(3):192–198.
39.
Bates BT, McCaw ST. A comparison between forward and backward locomotion. Human Locomotion IV. Quebec: Canadian Society for Biomechanics; 1986.
40.
Yang Y-R, Yen J-G, Wang R-Y, Yen L-L, Lieu F-K. Gait outcomes after additional backward walking training in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(3):264–273; doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr860oa.
41.
Dufek J, House A, Mangus B, Mercer J, Melcher G. Effects of backward walking as a modality for low back pain reduction in athletes. In: ISBS – Conference Proceedings Archive 2010.
42.
Rangey PS, Sheth MS, Vyas NJ. Comparison of effectiveness of forward and backward walking on pain, physical function, and quality of life in subjects with osteoarthritis of knee. Int J Health Allied Sci. 2016;5(4):220–226; doi: 10.4103/2278-344X.194085.
43.
Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Sarkar B, Paul AK, Anwar D. Effect of 6-week retro or forward walking program on pain, functional disability, quadriceps muscle strength, and performance in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial (retro-walking trial). BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2019;20:159; doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2537-9.
44.
Goldby LJ, Moore AP, Doust J, Trew ME. A randomized controlled trial investigating the efficiency of musculoskeletal physiotherapy on chronic low back disorder. Spine. 2006;31(10):1083–1093; doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000216464.37504.64.
45.
Alsaadi SM, McAuley JH, Hush JM, Maher CG. Erratum to: prevalence of sleep disturbance in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:554–560; doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1954-8.
46.
Driver HS, Taylor SR. Exercise and sleep. Sleep Med Rev. 2000;4(4):387–402; doi: 10.1053/smrv.2000.0110.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
