ORIGINAL PAPER
Moral values in the work of a physiotherapist
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
2
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
Submission date: 2022-03-03
Acceptance date: 2022-05-12
Publication date: 2022-05-25
Physiother Quart. 2023;31(4):57-63
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The goal of the study was to analyse the attitudes towards moral values adopted by Polish physiotherapists. Eight basic moral values were enumerated, namely: professionalism, care, fairness, dignity, autonomy, responsibility, trust, and professional integrity. The chosen values were analysed taking into account the sex, age, education, work experience, workplace and the knowledge of moral rules included in the Code of Professional Ethics of the Physiotherapist of the Republic of Poland and/or in the Rules of Professional Ethics of Physiotherapists (the Polish Chamber of Physiotherapists).
Methods:
The study embraced 199 professionally active physiotherapists, with 5 surveys not filled in correctly, which left 194.
Results:
Variables such as sex (p < 0.001) and workplace (p < 0.016) differentiate the respondents significantly in the context of the studied values. Physiotherapists with longer working experience also declare attitudes more closely based on moral values than physiotherapists with shorter working experience (p = 0.021). With regard to the adopted attitudes towards values, vital differences between men and women can be observed. Women choose fairness (p < 0.001) whereas men choose the ethics of care (p = 0.619). Physiotherapists employed by non-public centres are more oriented towards autonomous decisions than physiotherapists employed by publicly financed centres (p = 0.048).
Conclusions:
Numerous factors have been observed differentiating the attitudes of the respondents towards moral values. The differences may evidence a lack of uniform professional culture which might in turn translate into limited respect on the part of society. The variables differentiating the group are modal, thanks to which a change in the moral attitudes of Polish physiotherapists is possible.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Kiebzak W, Rusin M, Śliwiński Z, Dwornik M, Kiljański M. The culture of the profession and the personal culture of a physiotherapist [in Polish]. Fizjoter Pol. 2013;13(4):44–50.
2.
Rusin M, Kiebzak W, Kiljański M, Dwornik M, Śliwiński Z. Shaping ethical attitude of a physiotherapist [in Polish]. Fizjoter Pol. 2013;13(4):51–56.
3.
Ethical principles and the responsibilities of physiotherapists and member organisations Policy statement. World Physiotherapy; 2022. Available from:
https://world.physio/sites/def... [25.05.2022].
6.
Kiebzak W, Gieremek K, Florczyk M, Kiljański M. The Ethical Code of a Physiotherapist of the Republic of Poland [in Polish]. Available from:
http://fizjoterapia.org.pl/wp-... [03.03.2022].
7.
Pezdek K. Professional ethics of a physiotherapist: between fairness and care [in Polish]. Fizjoter Pol. 2015;15(2):92–99.
8.
Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994;309(6948):184–188; doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184.
9.
Varkey B. Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):17–28; doi: 10.1159/000509119.
10.
Pezdek K. The care of the self as a moral foundation of physiotherapy. Clin Ethics. 2021, 1–8; doi: 10.1177/14777509211061846.
11.
Przyłuska-Fiszer A. Disability as the Subject of Bioethical Reflection [in Polish]. Kraków: FALL; 2013:142–146.
12.
Ziemińska R. The ethics of care and the ethics of fairness. [in Polish]. Analysis Existence. 2008;8:115–131.
13.
Lim WS, Sharmab S, Devan H. Physiotherapists attitudes towards and challenges of working in a referral-based practice setting – a systematic scoping review. Eur J Physiother. 2021;23(6):332–343; doi: 10.1080/21679169.2020.1739748.
14.
Leslie JL, Lonneman W. Promoting trust in the registered nurse-patient relationship. Home Healthc Now. 2016;34(1):38–42; doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000322.
15.
Caenazzo L, Tozzo P, Borovečki A. Teaching ethics and professionalism in rehabilitation: an empirical research on active learning with university rehabilitation students. Clin Ter. 2020;171(5):444–448; doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2255.
16.
Pezdek. K, The responsibility as the value in the work of the physiotherapist [in Polish]. Fizjoterapia. 2010;18(1):73–77.
17.
Bradbury KJ, Bishop FL, Yardley L, Lewith G. Patients’ appraisals of public and private healthcare: a qualitative study of physiotherapy and osteopathy. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(10):1307–1318; doi: 10.1177/1359105312465101.
18.
Praestegaard J, Gard G. Ethical issues in physiotherapy – Reflected from the perspective of physiotherapists in private practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013;29(2):96–112; doi: 10.3109/09593985.2012.700388.
19.
Poulis I. Bioethics and physiotherapy. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(8):435–436; doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021139.
20.
Kulju K, Suhonen R, Puukka P, Tolvanen A, Leino-Kilpi H. Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):43; doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00469-3.
21.
Delany C, Edwards I, Fryer C. How physiotherapists perceive, interpret, and respond to the ethical dimensions of practice: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019;35(7):663–676; doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1456583.
22.
Kulju K, Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H. Ethical problems and moral sensitivity in physiotherapy. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20(5):568–577; doi: 10.1177/0969733012468462.
23.
Marques-Sulé E, Arnal-Gómez A, Cortés-Amador S, Inglés de la Torre M, Hernández D, Aguilar-Rodríguez M. Attitudes towards learning professional ethics in undergraduate physiotherapy students: a STROBE compliant cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;98:104771; doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104771.
24.
Shojaei A, Ghofrani M. Professional ethics in physiotherapy: existing challenges and flaws. J Modern Rehabil. 2018;12(1):39–44; doi: 10.32598/jmr.12.1.39.