About
Scope & Aims
Editorial office
Editorial board
Reviewers
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Articles & Issues
Current issue
Articles in press
Archive
For Authors
General rules
Guide for authors
Templates
Publication charge
For Reviewers
Guide for reviewers
Our reviewers
ORIGINAL PAPER
Intensity of arm swing exercise with music-movement synchrony in untrained young adults
1
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Movement Science and Exercise Research Center, Walailak University, Nakhonsithammarat, Thailand
2
School of Allied Health Sciences, World Union for Herbal Drug Discovery (WUHeDD), and Research Excellence Center for Innovation and Health Products (RECIHP), Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
3
CICECO – Aveiro Institute of Materials & Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Submission date: 2022-02-28
Acceptance date: 2022-05-25
Publication date: 2023-03-08
Physiother Quart. 2023;31(4):64-69
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The research aimed to study the intensity of arm swing exercise (ASE) with different tempi of music-movement synchrony in untrained young adults and to investigate the effect of different music tempi on heart rate and oxygen consumption.
Methods:
Participants were 30 healthy volunteers (15 males and 15 females), 20.67 ± 1.37 years and low-to-moderate physical activity. They performed ASE synchronised with music at a tempo of 60 and 140 bpm with a random sequence. They were measured for heart rate and oxygen consumption using a Quark SPIRO (COSMED) before and after the ASE for 6 minutes of each tempo. They rested for at least 15 minutes between music tempi during the ASE. The intensity of ASE with music-movement synchrony of each tempo was calculated as a percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRmax) and percentage maximum oxygen consumption (%VO2max).
Results:
The %HRmax of all participants post-ASE at 60 and 140 bpm were 58.64 ± 8.82 and 60.12 ± 8.95%, respectively. The %VO2max of all participants post-ASE at 60 and 140 bpm were 38.65 ± 11.36 and 40.17 ± 10.71%, respectively. There was no significant difference in HR and VO2 of ASE between music tempi.
Conclusions:
The ASE with music-movement synchrony at 60 and 140 bpm is a low-intensity aerobic exercise, so is a suitable choice for people with low physical activity. Furthermore, the faster tempo did not significantly alter the intensity, therefore, we recommend selecting the slower music tempo at 60 bpm to avoid repetitive shoulder joint injury.
The research aimed to study the intensity of arm swing exercise (ASE) with different tempi of music-movement synchrony in untrained young adults and to investigate the effect of different music tempi on heart rate and oxygen consumption.
Methods:
Participants were 30 healthy volunteers (15 males and 15 females), 20.67 ± 1.37 years and low-to-moderate physical activity. They performed ASE synchronised with music at a tempo of 60 and 140 bpm with a random sequence. They were measured for heart rate and oxygen consumption using a Quark SPIRO (COSMED) before and after the ASE for 6 minutes of each tempo. They rested for at least 15 minutes between music tempi during the ASE. The intensity of ASE with music-movement synchrony of each tempo was calculated as a percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRmax) and percentage maximum oxygen consumption (%VO2max).
Results:
The %HRmax of all participants post-ASE at 60 and 140 bpm were 58.64 ± 8.82 and 60.12 ± 8.95%, respectively. The %VO2max of all participants post-ASE at 60 and 140 bpm were 38.65 ± 11.36 and 40.17 ± 10.71%, respectively. There was no significant difference in HR and VO2 of ASE between music tempi.
Conclusions:
The ASE with music-movement synchrony at 60 and 140 bpm is a low-intensity aerobic exercise, so is a suitable choice for people with low physical activity. Furthermore, the faster tempo did not significantly alter the intensity, therefore, we recommend selecting the slower music tempo at 60 bpm to avoid repetitive shoulder joint injury.
REFERENCES (33)
1.
Tavolacci MP, Wouters E, van de Velde S, Buffel V, Déchelotte P, van Hal G, et al. The impact of covid-19 lockdown on health behaviors among students of a French university. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):4346; doi:10.3390/ijerph18084346.
2.
Dunton GF, Wang SD, Do B, Courtney J. Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity locations and behaviors in adults living in the United States. Prev Med Rep. 2020;20:101241; doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101241.
3.
Woods JA, Hutchinson NT, Powers SK, Roberts WO, Gomez-Cabrera MC, Radak Z, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and physical activity. Sport Med Health Sci. 2020;2(2):55–64; doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2020.05.006.
4.
Siengluecha A, Intarakamhang P, Senakham T. The intensity levels of the synchronous arm swing exercise in sitting and standing positions: a study in healthy subjects. J Thai Rehabil Med. 2008;18(3):90–97.
5.
Leelayuwat N, Tunkumnerdthai O, Donsom M, Punyaek N, Manimanakorn A, Kukongviriyapan U, et al. An alternative exercise and its beneficial effects on glycaemic control and oxidative stress in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82(2):168–171; doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.08.010.
6.
Tunkamnerdthai O, Auvichayapat P, Donsom M, Leelayuwat N. Improvement of pulmonary function with arm swing exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):649–654; doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.649.
7.
Prasertsri P, Singsanan S, Chonanant C, Boonla O, Trongtosak P. Effects of arm swing exercise training on cardiac autonomic modulation, cardiovascular risk factors, and electrolytes in persons aged 60–80 years with prehypertension: a randomized controlled trial. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2019;17(2):47–54; doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.11.002.
8.
Gonçalves C, Raimundo A, Abreu A, Bravo J. Exercise intensity in patients with cardiovascular diseases: systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3574; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073574.
9.
Prasertsri P, Boonla O, Phoemsapthawee J, Leelayuwat N. Comparative effects of arm swing and leg cycling exercise on exercise capacity and cardiac autonomic activity of sedentary young adults. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2017;20(3):53–65.
10.
Xiao Z, Eungpinichpong W, Wang X, Chatchawan U, Hu Y. Immediate effects of arm swing exercise therapy on shoulder range of motion and forward head posture: a pilot study in young adults. Int J Geomate. 2020;18(67):188–194; doi: 10.21660/2020.67.5545.
11.
Clark IN, Baker FA, Taylor NF. The modulating effects of music listening on health-related exercise and physical activity in adults: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Nord J Music Ther. 2016;25(1):76–104; doi: 10.1080/08098131.2015.1008558.
12.
Thakare AE, Mehrotra R, Singh A. Effect of music tempo on exercise performance and heart rate among young adults. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2017;9(2):35–39.
13.
World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific (WPRO). International Association for the Study of Obesity, International Obesity Task Force. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining obesity and its treatment. Sydney: Health Communications Australia Pty Ltd; 2000.
14.
Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36(5):936–942; doi: 10.1093/ajcn/36.5.936.
15.
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
16.
Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(1):153–156; doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01054-8.
17.
Uth N, Sørensen H, Overgaard K, Pedersen PK. Estimation of VO2max from the ratio between HRmax and HRrest – the heart rate ratio method. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;91(1):111–115; doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0988-y.
18.
Barkley JE, Penko AL. Physiologic responses, perceived exertion, and hedonics of playing a physical interactive video game relative to a sedentary alternative and treadmill walking in adults. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2009;12(3):12–22.
19.
Swain DP. ACSM’s Resource Manual for Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Baltimore: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
20.
Centala J, Pogorel C, Pummill SW, Malek MH. Listening to fast-tempo music delays the onset of neuromuscular fatigue. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(3):617–622; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003417.
21.
Terry PC, Karageorghis CI, Saha AM, D’Auria S. Effects of synchronous music on treadmill running among elite triathletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(1):52–57; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.06.003.
22.
Karageorghis CI, Priest DL. Music in the exercise domain: a review and synthesis (Part I). Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012;5(1):44–66; doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2011.631026.
23.
Woo JS, Derleth C, Stratton JR, Levy WC. The influence of age, gender, and training on exercise efficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(5):1049–1057; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.066.
24.
Oydanich M, Babici D, Zhang J, Rynecki N, Vatner DE, Vatner SF. Mechanisms of sex differences in exercise capacity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2019;316(6):832–838; doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00394.2018.
25.
Macagnan FE, Feoli AMP, Russomano T. Acute physical effort increases sympathovagal balance responses to autonomic stimulation in metabolic syndrome. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2019;17(1):67–74; doi: 10.1089/met.2018.0065.
26.
Cohen S, Paradis C, LeMura L. The effects of contingent monetary reinforcement and music on exercise in college students. J Sport Behav. 2007;30(2):146–160.
27.
Burger B, Thompson MR, Luck G, Saarikallio S, Toiviainen P. Influences of rhythm- and timbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Front Psychol. 2013;4:183; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00183.
28.
Phillips-Silver J, Trainor LJ. Hearing what the body feels: auditory encoding of rhythmic movement. Cognition. 2007;105(3):533–546; doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.11.006.
29.
Castañeda-Babarro A, Marqués-Jiménez D, Calleja-González J, Viribay A, León-Guereño P, Mielgo-Ayuso J. Effect of listening to music on Wingate anaerobic test performance. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12):4564; doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124564.
30.
Sparling PB, Cureton KJ. Biological determinants of the sex difference in 12-min run performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15(3):218–223.
31.
Sharma HB, Kailashiya J. Gender difference in aerobic capacity and the contribution by body composition and haemoglobin concentration: a study in young Indian national hockey players. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(11):9–13; doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20873.8831.
32.
Cureton K, Bishop P, Hutchinson P, Newland H, Vickery S, Zwiren L. Sex difference in maximal oxygen uptake. Effect of equating haemoglobin concentration. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;54(6):656–660; doi: 10.1007/BF00943356.
33.
Churproong S, Khampirat B, Ratanajaipan P, Tattathongkom P. The effect of the arm swing on the heart rate of non-athletes. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(Suppl 4):79–86.
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
