REVIEW PAPER
Effectiveness of combined therapy in physical therapy for the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
 
More details
Hide details
1
Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago de Chile, Chile
 
 
Submission date: 2023-01-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-04-18
 
 
Publication date: 2024-06-21
 
 
Corresponding author
Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz   

Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences institute, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, 7591538, Chile
 
 
Physiother Quart. 2024;32(2):1-18
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Therapeutic ultrasound and electrotherapy are commonly used in physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain (MSP) management. Combined therapy (CT) is a resource that merges both techniques, enhancing the analgesic effects of both treatments, although studies are limited.

Objective:
To determine the effectiveness of CT in physical therapy for the management of MSP.

Methods:
The PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cinahl, Science Direct, and PEDro databases were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) (updated June 5, 2024). RCTs comparing CT with other physical therapy treatments for MSP were included. Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria, including those of the qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis types. The Cochrane Rob2 tool was used to assess the articles’ quality.

Results:
RCTs were assessed as having a low risk of bias for all RoB2 domains. Although the qualitative synthesis reports a reduction in pain, an increase in ROM, and less disability in favour of CT, the quantitative analysis only shows large, statistically significant effect sizes (Cohen’s d) (p < 0.05) for the standardised mean differences (SMD) in pain (SMD = 0.9; CI = 0.8, 1.1) and ROM (SMD = –0.93; CI = –1.1, –0.8). These analgesic and ROM benefits improve when CT is applied with interferential currents (Pain: SMD = –1.54; IC = –1.8, –1.3) (ROM: SMD = 2.28; CI = 1.8, 2.7). Although the analgesic evidence was qualified as important, the heterogeneity obtained in the studies (I2 > 75%) moderates its degree of recommendation.

Conclusions:
This SR shows that CT has better analgesic effects than TENS, interferential currents, or therapeutic ultrasound alone, which supports the idea of a combined analgesic effect. The researchers propose dosage recommendations for clinical practice and future research.

REFERENCES (56)
1.
Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021;396(10267):2006–17; doi: 0.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0.
 
2.
Kennedy PC, Purtill H, O’Sullivan K. Musculoskeletal pain in primary care physiotherapy: associations with demographic and general health characteristics. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;35:61–66; doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.03.001.
 
3.
Blyth FM, Briggs AM, Schneider CH, Hoy DG, March LM. The Global Burden of musculoskeletal pain-where to from here? Am J Public Health. 2019;109(1):35–40; doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304747.
 
4.
Trulsson Schouenborg A, Rivano Fischer M, Bondesson E, Jöud A. Physiotherapist-led rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: interventions and promising long-term outcomes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):910; doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04780-x.
 
5.
Babatunde OO, Jordan JL, Van der Windt DA, Hill JC, Foster NE, Protheroe J. Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic overview of current evidence. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178621; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178621.
 
6.
George SZ, Goode AP. Physical therapy and opioid use for musculoskeletal pain management: competitors or companions? Pain Rep. 2020;5(5):e827; doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000827.
 
7.
Derry S, Conaghan P, Da Silva JAP, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA. Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD007400; doi: 1002/14651858.CD007400.pub3.
 
8.
Arribas-Romano A, Fernández-Carnero J, Molina-Rueda F, Angulo-Diaz-Parreño S, Navarro-Santana MJ. Efficacy of physical therapy on nociceptive pain processing alterations in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2020;21(10):2502–17; doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz366.
 
9.
Flynn DM. Chronic musculoskeletal pain: nonpharmacologic, noninvasive treatments. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102(8):465–77.
 
10.
Fredin K, Lorås H. Manual therapy, exercise therapy or combined treatment in the management of adult neck pain – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;31:62–71; doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.07.005.
 
11.
Geneen LJ, Moore RA, Clarke C, Martin D, Colvin LA, Smith BH. Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD011279; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub3.
 
12.
Noori SA, Rasheed A, Aiyer R, Jung B, Bansal N, Chang K-V, Ottestad E, Gulati A. Therapeutic ultrasound for pain management in chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain: a systematic review. Pain Med. 2020;21(7):1482–1493; doi: 10.1093/pm/pny287.
 
13.
Paley CA, Wittkopf PG, Jones G, Johnson MI. Does TENS reduce the intensity of acute and chronic pain? A comprehensive appraisal of the characteristics and outcomes of 169 reviews and 49 meta-analyses. Medi­cina. 2021;57(10):1060; doi: 10.3390/medicina57101060.
 
14.
Gibson W, Wand BM, Meads C, Catley MJ, O’Connell NE. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain – an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD011890; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011890.pub3.
 
15.
Fuentes JP, Armijo Olivo S, Magee DJ, Gross DP. Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2010;90(9):1219–38; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090335.
 
16.
Cameron MH. Physical Agents in Rehabilitation. An Evidence-Based Approach to Practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier – Health Sciences Division; 2022.
 
17.
Watson T (ed.) Electrotherapy. Evidence-Based Practice. 12th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2019.
 
18.
Vance CGT, Dailey DL, Chimenti RL, Van Gorp BJ, Crofford LJ, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: update on the state of the evidence. Medicina. 2022;58(10):1332; doi: 10.3390/medicina58101332.
 
19.
Liebano RE, Rakel B, Vance CGT, Walsh DM, Sluka KA. An investigation of the development of analgesic tolerance to TENS in humans. Pain. 2011;152(2):335–42; doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.040.
 
20.
Almeida TF, Roizenblatt S, Benedito-Silva AA, Tufik S. The effect of combined therapy (ultrasound and interferential current) on pain and sleep in fibromyalgia. Pain. 2003;104(3):665–72; doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00139-8.
 
21.
Moretti FA, Marcondes FB, Provenza JR, Fukuda TY, de Vasconcelos RA, Roizenblatt S. Combined therapy (ultrasound and interferential current) in patients with fibromyalgia: once or twice in a week?: combined therapy in fibromyalgia. Physiother Res Int. 2012;17(3):142–49; doi: 10.1002/pri.525.
 
22.
Kim E-D, Won YH, Park S-H, Seo J-H, Kim D-S, Ko M-H, Kim G-W. Efficacy and safety of a stimulator using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis. Pain Res Manag. 2019;2019:7964897; doi: 10.1155/2019/7964897.
 
23.
Király M, Gömöri E, Kiss R, Nógrádi N, Nusser N, Hodosi K, Bender T. Effects of various types of ultrasound therapy in hip osteoarthritis – a double-blind, randomized, controlled, follow-up study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;38(12):1958–68; doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1895386.
 
24.
Takla MKN, Rezk-Allah SS. Immediate effects of simultaneous application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and ultrasound phonophoresis on active myofascial trigger points: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(5):332–38; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000876.
 
25.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):89; doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
 
26.
Johnson MI, Paley CA, Jones G, Mulvey MR, Wittkopf PG. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study). BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e051073; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051073.
 
27.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58; doi: 10.1002/sim.1186.
 
28.
Cashin AG, McAuley JH. Clinimetrics: physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. J Physiother. 2020;66(1):59; doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.005.
 
29.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blenco­we NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Las­serson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898; doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
 
30.
McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021;12(1):55–61; doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411.
 
31.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):380–82; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011.
 
32.
Lee JC, Lin DT, Hong C-Z. The effectiveness of simultaneous thermotherapy with ultrasound and electrotherapy with combined AC and DC current on the immediate pain relief of myofascial trigger points. J Musculoskelet Pain. 1997;5(1):81–90; doi: 10.1300/j094v05n01_06.
 
33.
Mukkannavar PB. Effect of combination therapy [tens & ultrasound] and ischemic compression in the treatment of active myofascial trigger points. J Excercise Sci Physiother. 2012;8(2):95; doi: 10.18376//2012/v8i2/67589.
 
34.
Podczarska-Głowacka M, Łysak A. Use of combined therapy (TENS+UD) and postisometric relaxation (PIR) of muscles in seniors with degenerative disease of the hip jointnt. J Pre-Clin Clin Res. 2016;10(2):95–9; doi: 10.5604/18982395.1227564.
 
35.
Boonhong J, Suntornpiyapan P, Piriyajarukul A. Ultrasound combined transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (UltraTENS) versus phonophoresis of piroxicam (PhP) in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind, controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):507–13; doi: 10.3233/BMR-150492.
 
36.
Takla MKN. Low-frequency high-intensity versus medium-frequency low-intensity combined therapy in the management of active myofascial trigger points: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2018;23(4):e1737; doi: 10.1002/pri.1737.
 
37.
Sangtong K, Chupinijrobkob C, Putthakumnerd W, Kuptniratsaikul V. Does adding transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to therapeutic ultrasound affect pain or function in people with osteoarthritis of the knee? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(7):1197–205; doi: 10.1177/0269215519838017.
 
38.
Usman Z, Maharaj SS, Kaka B. Effects of combination therapy and infrared radiation on pain, physical function, and quality of life in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2019;39(2):133–42; doi: 10.1142/S1013702519500124.
 
39.
Ariel E, Levkovitz Y, Goor-Aryeh I, Motti R. The effects of TENS, interferential stimulation, and combined interferential stimulation and pulsed ultrasound on patients with disc herniation-induced radicular pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(2):363–71; doi: 10.3233/BMR-200302.
 
40.
Johnson MI, Jones G, Paley CA, Wittkopf PG. The clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain: a protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e029999; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029999.
 
41.
Xia P, Wang X, Lin Q, Cheng K, Li X. Effectiveness of ultrasound therapy for myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2017;10:545–555; doi: 10.2147/JPR.S13148.
 
42.
Dowdy A, Peltier C, Tincani M, Schneider WJ, Hantula DA, Travers JC. Meta-analyses and effect sizes in applied behavior analysis: a review and discussion. J Appl Behav Anal. 2021;54(4):1317–40; doi: 10.1002/jaba.862.
 
43.
Mendell LM. Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain. Pain. 2014;155(2):210–216; doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.010.
 
44.
Rampazo ÉP, Liebano RE. Analgesic effects of interferential current therapy: a narrative review. Medicina. 2022;58(1):141; doi: 10.3390/medicina58010141.
 
45.
Ariel E, Ratmansky M, Levkovitz Y, Goor-Aryeh I. Efficiency of tissue penetration by currents induced by 3 electrotherapeutic techniques: a comparative study using a novel deep-tissue measuring technique. Phys Ther. 2019;99(5):540–48; doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz005.
 
46.
Skúladóttir H, Gunnarsdóttir TJ, Halldórsdóttir S, Sveinsdóttir H, Holden JE, Björnsdóttir A. Breaking the vicious circle: Experiences of people in chronic pain on the pain rehabilitation journey. Nurs Open. 2020;7(5):1412–23; doi: 10.1002/nop2.512.
 
47.
Sluka KA, Baxter GD, Basford JR. Overview of other electrophysical and thermal agents. Mechanisms and management of pain for the physical therapist. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/IASP Press; 2016: pp. 191–204.
 
48.
Roush SE, Sharby N. Disability reconsidered: the paradox of physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2011;91(12):1715–27; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100389.
 
49.
Bertozzi L, Gardenghi I, Turoni F, Villafañe JH, Capra F, Guccione AA, Pillastrini P. Effect of therapeutic exercise on pain and disability in the management of chronic nonspecific neck pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Phys Ther. 2013;93(8):1026–36; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120412.
 
50.
Kuru Çolak T, Kavlak B, Aydoğdu O, Şahin E, Acar G, Demirbüken İ, Sarı Z, Çolak İ, Bulut G, Polat MG. The effects of therapeutic exercises on pain, muscle strength, functional capacity, balance and hemodynamic parameters in knee osteoarthritis patients: a randomized controlled study of supervised versus home exercises. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(3):399–407; doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3646-5.
 
51.
Kyte DG, Calvert M, van der Wees PJ, ten Hove R, Tolan S, Hill JC. An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(2):119–25; doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.11.003.
 
52.
Salaffi F, Leardini G, Canesi B, Mannoni A, Fioravanti A, Caporali R, Lapadula G, Punzi L; GOnorthrosis and Quality Of Life Assessment (GOQOLA). Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11(8):551–60; doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00089-x.
 
53.
Wukich DK, Sambenedetto TL, Mota NM, Suder NC, Rosario BL. Correlation of SF-36 and SF-12 component scores in patients with diabetic foot disease. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(4):693–96; doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.12.009.
 
54.
Berthelot J-M, Le Goff B, Maugars Y. The Hawthorne effect: stronger than the placebo effect? Joint Bone Spine. 2011;78(4):335–36; doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.06.001.
 
55.
Benedetti F, Carlino E, Piedimonte A. Increasing uncertainty in CNS clinical trials: the role of placebo, nocebo, and Hawthorne effects. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(7):736–47; doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00066-1.
 
56.
Ortiz H, Cancino J, Goluboff N, Obando G, Jara M, Vera M. Effects of ascending and descending direct current on grip strength assessed through dynamometry and myofeedback: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Quart. 2020;28(2):1–8; doi: 10.5114/pq.2020.92471.
 
eISSN:2544-4395
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top