ORIGINAL PAPER
Impact of smartphone use on posture control in healthy adolescents
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Pediatric Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
 
 
Submission date: 2022-06-10
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-09-19
 
 
Publication date: 2024-03-25
 
 
Corresponding author
Esraa Anter   

Department of Pediatric Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, 7 Ahmed Alzayate ST, Been Alsarayat, 12662, Giza, Egypt
 
 
Physiother Quart. 2024;32(1):100-104
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Smartphone (SP) use among adolescents is constantly increasing, and it has been reported that SP usage is detrimental to a number of health-related factors. This study was conducted to determine whether the use of SPs has an immediate impact on posture control in healthy adolescents and whether different time limits have different effects.

Methods:
This single-group experiment was conducted on 75 adolescents aged between 13 and 18. Subjects’ static balance was evaluated using the Humac balance system before using an SP and after 10 min, 15 min, 20 min SP use, and 20 min using the SP with a headpiece. The stabilometric measures, including stability and path length scores, were obtained.

Results:
By comparing stability scores and path length scores between baseline static assessment, after 10 min, after 15 min, after 20 min, and after 20 min of using an SP with a headpiece, we found that there was a significant difference between baseline static assessment and reassessment after all time limits. Following the use of an SP, the stability scores decreased, and path length scores increased. We also found no significant difference in stabilometric scores between different time limits of SP use. Furthermore, there were no substantial differences regarding posture control between the use of SP with and without headpieces.

Conclusions:
Based on our study’s findings, SP use has an immediate effect on posture control with different time limits in healthy adolescents. Therefore, it is better to avoid SP use before or during activities requiring good postural stability.

REFERENCES (32)
1.
Wilmer HH, Sherman LE, Chein JM. Smartphones and cognition: a review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Front Psychol. 2017;8; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605.
 
2.
Elhai JD, Dvorak RD, Levine JC, Hall BJ. Problematic smartphone use: a conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. J Affect Disord. 2017;207:251–259; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030.
 
3.
Lee H, Seo MJ, Choi TY. The effect of home-based daily journal writing in Korean adolescents with smartphone addiction. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(5):764–769; doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.764.
 
4.
Panova T, Carbonell X. Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? J Behav Addict. 2018;7(2):252–259; doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.49.
 
5.
van Deursen AJAM, Bolle CL, Hegner SM, Kommers PA. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:411–420; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039.
 
6.
Panova T, Lleras A. Avoidance or boredom: negative mental health outcomes associated with use of information and communication technologies depend on users’ motivations. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;58:249–258; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.062.
 
7.
Kee IK, Byun JS, Jung JK, Choi JK. The presence of altered craniocervical posture and mobility in smartphone-addicted teenagers with temporomandibular disorders. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016; 28(2):339–346; doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.339.
 
8.
Reda M, Rabie M, Mohsen N, Hassan A. Problematic Internet users and psychiatric morbidity in a sample of Egyptian adolescents. Psychology. 2012;3(8):626–631; doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.38096.
 
9.
Ma C, Li W, Cao J, Wang S, Wu L. A fatigue detect system based on activity recognition. In: Fortino G, Di Fatta G, Li W, Ochoa S, Cuzzocrea A, Pathan M (eds.), Internet and Distributed Computing Systems. IDCS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham, Springer; 2014: 8729:303–311; doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-11692-1_26.
 
10.
Charpiot A, Tringali S, Ionescu E, Vital-Durand F, Ferber-Viart C. Vestibulo-ocular reflex and balance maturation in healthy children aged from six to twelve years. Audiol Neurotol. 2010;15(4): 203–210; doi: 10.1159/000255338.
 
11.
Third A, Bellerose D, De Oliveira JD, Lala G, Theakstone G. Young and online: children’s perspectives on life in the digital age (State of the world’s children 2017 companion report). 2017; doi: 10.4225/35/5a1b885f6d4db.
 
12.
Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35(Suppl 2):7–11. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl077.
 
13.
Abuin-Porras V, Villafañe JH, Jiménez-Antona C, Palacios A, Martínez-Pascual B, Rodríguez-Costa I. Relationship between attention and balance: a dual-task condition study in children. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018;14(3):349–355; doi: 10.12965/jer.1836142.071.
 
14.
Lee S, Choi Y-H, Kim J. Effects of the cervical flexion angle during smartphone use on muscle fatigue and pain in the cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius in normal adults in their 20s. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017; 29(5):921–923; doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.921.
 
15.
Samir SM, Elshinnawy AM, Abd Elrazik RK, Battesha HHM, El Sayed Abdelkarem Ali M, Gazya AA. The long-term effect of smartphone overuse on cervical posture and range of motion in asymptomatic sedentary adults. J Adv Pharm Edu Res. 2019;9(4):89–95.
 
16.
Lee JH, Lee MH. The effects of smartphone multitasking on gait and dynamic balance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018; 30(2):293–296; doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.293.
 
17.
Cohen H, Blatchly CA, Gombash LL. A study of the clinical test of sensory interaction and balance. Phys Ther. 1993;73(6):346–351; doi: 10.1093/ptj/73.6.346.
 
18.
AlAbdulwahab SS, Kachanathu SJ, AlMotairi MS. Smartphone use addiction can cause neck disability. Musculoskeletal Care. 2017;15(1):10–12; doi: 10.1002/ msc.1170.
 
19.
Shafeek MM, Battesha HHM, Wadee AN, Ibrahim HM. Influence of a smartphone use on dynamic balance in healthy adults. Hum Mov. 2022;23(2):76–83; doi: 10.5114/hm.2021.106171.
 
20.
Lee D, Hong S, Jung S, Lee K, Lee G. The Effects of viewing smart devices on static balance, oculomotor function, and dizziness in healthy adults. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:8055–8060. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915284.
 
21.
Beliche T, da Silva Hamu TCD, Bizinotto T, Porto CC, Kayenne C, Formiga CKMR. The postural control of Brazilian children aged 6 to 9 years using a smartphone is similar to their posture with eyes closed. J Hum Growth Dev. 2021;31(2):199–208; doi: 10.36311/jhgd.v31.12229.
 
22.
Hyong IH. The effects on dynamic balance of dual-tasking using smartphone functions. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(2):527–529; doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.527.
 
23.
Cho SH, Choi MH, Goo BO. Effect of smart phone use on dynamic postural balance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(7):1013–1015; doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1013.
 
24.
Laatar R, Kachouri H, Borji R, Rebai H, Sahli S. The effect of cell phone use on postural balance and mobility in older compared to young adults. Physiol Behav 2017;173:293–297; doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.031.
 
25.
Schabrun SM, van den Hoorn W, Moorcroft A, Greenland C, Hodges PW. Texting and walking: strategies for postural control and implications for safety. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e91489; doi: 10.1371/ journal. pone.0084312.
 
26.
Robert MT, Ballaz L, Lemay M: The effect of viewing a virtual environment through a head-mounted display on balance. Gait Posture. 2016;48:261–266; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.010.
 
27.
Palluel E, Nougier V, Olivier I. Postural control and attentional demand during adolescence. Brain Res. 2010;1358:151–159; doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.051.
 
28.
Viel S, Vaugoyeau M, Assaiante C. Adolescence: a transient period of proprioceptive neglect in sensory integration of postural control. Motor Control. 2009;13(1):25–42; doi: 10.1123/mcj.13.1.25.
 
29.
Leatherdale ST, Manske S, Faulkner G, Arbour K, Bredin C. A multi-level examination of school programs, policies and resources associated with physical activity among elementary school youth in the PLAY-ON study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(1):6; doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-6.
 
30.
Mojica CM, Parra-Medina D, Yin Z, Akopian D, Esparza L. Assessing media access and use among Latina adolescents to inform development of a physical activity promotion intervention incorporating text messaging. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(4):548–555; doi: 10.1177/1524839913514441.
 
31.
Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM: Changing complexity in human behavior and physiology through aging and disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23(1):1–11; doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00247-0.
 
32.
Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(1):M10–16; doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.1.m10.
 
eISSN:2544-4395
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top