REVIEW PAPER
The effect of low-level laser therapy on peripheral nerve lesions:
a systematic review
1
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, New Heliopolis University, Cairo, Egypt
2
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
3
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
4
Department of Physical Therapy for Paediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
5
Faculty of Physical Therapy, EL Nahda University, Cairo, Egypt
6
Department of Physical Therapy for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
7
Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Saudi Arabia
Submission date: 2024-01-04
Acceptance date: 2024-09-05
Online publication date: 2025-07-24
Corresponding author
Mahmoud S. El Fakharany
Department of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, 7 Ahmed El Zaiat Street, Bein El Sarayat, Giza, Egypt, Egypt
Department of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, 7 Ahmed El Zaiat Street, Bein El Sarayat, Giza, Egypt, Egypt
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Peripheral nerve lesions (PNLs) are highly prevalent among humans and lead to severe and long-term physiological and functional disabilities. This systematic review assessed low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on PNL patients as a safe conventional intervention.
Material and Methods:
PubMed, Google Scholar, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Scopus, Egyptian Knowledge Bank, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for relevant articles published between 2007 and 2024 (last search update: July 1st, 2024). Two independent authors reviewed the data extracted from the included articles to evaluate variability, while the PEDro scale assessed methodological quality. Variables and outcomes assessed included pain intensity [visual analogue scale (VAS)], sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), and compound motor action potential [assessed by electromyography (EMG)]. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was applied using mean difference (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
Results:
The initial search yielded 1539 articles, of which only eight were included in this review. The results of the included studies revealed evidence of positive effects of laser therapy in PNL patients, with pain intensity (p = 0.02) treated more effectively than SNCV (p = 0.01). However, no effect on compound motor action potential was found (p = 0.56). The data analysis derived pooled MD values for pain intensity (Z = 2.38), SNCV (Z = 2.59), and compound action potential (Z = 0.58).
Conclusions:
The evidence supports that LLLT benefits PNL patients by reducing pain intensity and improving sensory electrophysiological outcomes, but no improvements were found for motor electrophysiological outcomes.
Peripheral nerve lesions (PNLs) are highly prevalent among humans and lead to severe and long-term physiological and functional disabilities. This systematic review assessed low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on PNL patients as a safe conventional intervention.
Material and Methods:
PubMed, Google Scholar, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Scopus, Egyptian Knowledge Bank, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for relevant articles published between 2007 and 2024 (last search update: July 1st, 2024). Two independent authors reviewed the data extracted from the included articles to evaluate variability, while the PEDro scale assessed methodological quality. Variables and outcomes assessed included pain intensity [visual analogue scale (VAS)], sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), and compound motor action potential [assessed by electromyography (EMG)]. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was applied using mean difference (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
Results:
The initial search yielded 1539 articles, of which only eight were included in this review. The results of the included studies revealed evidence of positive effects of laser therapy in PNL patients, with pain intensity (p = 0.02) treated more effectively than SNCV (p = 0.01). However, no effect on compound motor action potential was found (p = 0.56). The data analysis derived pooled MD values for pain intensity (Z = 2.38), SNCV (Z = 2.59), and compound action potential (Z = 0.58).
Conclusions:
The evidence supports that LLLT benefits PNL patients by reducing pain intensity and improving sensory electrophysiological outcomes, but no improvements were found for motor electrophysiological outcomes.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Kamble N, Shukla D, Bhat D. Peripheral nerve injuries: electrophysiology for the neurosurgeon. Neurol India. 2019;67(6):1419–22; doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.273626.
2.
Brazis PW (eds.). Localization in Clinical Neurology. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2016, pp. 27–78.
3.
Brannagan III TH. Peripheral neuropathies. In: Brust JCM (ed.). Current Diagnosis and Treatment Neurology. 3rd ed. Columbus: McGraw-Hill Education; 2019, pp. 297–340.
4.
Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, Caliandro P, Hobson-Webb LD. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1273–84; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9.
5.
Rochkind S. Photobiomodulation in neuroscience: a summary of personal experience. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017;35(11):604–15; doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4381.
6.
Cotler HB, Chow RT, Hamblin MR, Carroll J. The use of low level laser therapy (LLLT) for musculoskeletal pain. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol. 2015;2(5):00068; doi: 10.15406/mojor.20 15.02.00068.
7.
Horntvedt M-ET, Nordsteien A, Fermann T, Severinsson E. Strategies for teaching evidence-based practice in nursing education: a thematic literature review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1); doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1278-z.
8.
Al-Jundi A. Sakka S. Critical appraisal of clinical research. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(5):JE01; doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942 .
9.
Singh S. How to conduct and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017;8(5):e93; doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.20.
10.
Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, Littlewood A, Marshall C, Metzendorf M-I, Noel-Storr A, Rader T, Shokraneh F, Thomas J, Wieland LS; on behalf of the Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Searching for and selecting studies. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane; 2019.
11.
Da Silva A, Pedrosa M. Using reference manager (Mendeley) in systematic reviews. Abstracts of the Global Evidence Summit, Cape Town, South Africa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(9 Suppl 1); doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD201702.
12.
Leonardo R. PICO: model for clinical questions. Evid Based Med Pract. 2018;3:115; doi: 10.4172/2471-9919.1000115.
13.
Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–21; doi: 10.1093/ptj/83.8.713.
14.
De Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):129–33; doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70043-1.
15.
Rochkind S, Drory V, Alon M, Nissan M, Ouaknine GE. Laser phototherapy (780 nm), a new modality in treatment of long-term incomplete peripheral nerve injury: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007;25(5):436–42; doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2093.
16.
Shooshtari SMJ, Badiee V, Taghizadeh SH, Nematollahi AH, Amanollahi AH, Grami MT. The effects of low level laser in clinical outcome and neurophysiological results of carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;48(5):229–31.
17.
Yagci I, Elmas O, Akcan E, Ustun I, Gunduz OH, Guven Z. Comparison of splinting and splinting plus low-level laser therapy in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28(9):1059–65; doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1213-0.
18.
Fusakul Y, Aranyavalai T, Saensri P, Thiengwittayaporn S. Low-level laser therapy with a wrist splint to treat carpal tunnel syndrome: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(3):1279–87; doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1527-2.
19.
Zoheiry I, Emad, Hamada HE, Khatib A. Impact of high intensity laser therapy on post burn cubital tunnel syndrome. Biosci Res. 2019;15(4):3380–6.
20.
Elgendy A, Ali M, Medhat A, Zikri E, Ganem MF. Therapeutic and photobiomodulation effects of low-level laser irradiation on Egyptian patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a placebo-controlled study. J Arab Soc Med Res. 2020;15(1):18–24; doi: 10.4103/jasmr.jasmr_7_20.
21.
Atiaa AG, Al Balah OF, Mostafa KAH, Abas DN, El Wahab HHA. Effect of low level laser therapy on nerve conduction velocity in diabetic neuropathic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann RSCB. 2021;25(3):355–62.
22.
Nalbant M, Yemişci OÜ, Özen S, Tezcan Ş. Ultrasonographic and electrophysiological outcomes of carpal tunnel syndrome treated with low-level laser therapy: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study. Arch Rheumatol. 2022;37(1):19–30; doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2022.8605.
23.
Selçuk AA. A guide for systematic reviews: PRISMA. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;57(1):57–8; doi:10.5152/tao.2019.4058.
24.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A):139–45; doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002.
25.
Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang Y-Y, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(2):516–33; doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0454-7.
26.
DeSousa MVP, Kawakubo M, Ferraresi C, Kaippert B, Yoshimura EM, Hamblin MR. Pain management using photobiomodulation: mechanisms, location, and repeatability quantified by pain threshold and neural biomarkers in mice. J Biophotonics. 2018;11:e201700370; doi: 10.1002/jbio.201700370.
27.
Mandelbaum-Livnat MM, Almog M, Nissan M, Loeb E, Shapira Y, Rochkind S. Photobiomodulation triple treatment in peripheral nerve injury: nerve and muscle response. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(12):638–45; doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4095.
28.
Aghamohamdi D, Fakhari S, Farhoudi M, Farzin H. The efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of Bell’s palsy in diabetic patients. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020;11(3):310–5; doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.52.
29.
Foo YH, Tunku Ahmad Yahaya TS, Chung TY, Silvanathan JP. Photobiomodulation after neurotization (Oberlin procedure) in brachial plexus injury: a randomized control trial. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020;38(4):215–21; doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4757.
30.
Perić Z, Cvetković B. Electrophysiological evaluation of low-intensity laser therapy in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. Facta Univ S Med Biol. 2006;13(1):11–4.
31.
Forootan KS, Farokh FS, Madani SP, Estahbanati HK, Forootan NSS. Laser therapy after the repair of the distal half of the median nerve: a comparative study. Trauma Mon. 2015;20(2);e23816; doi: 10.5812/traumamon.20(2)2015.23816.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
