ORIGINAL PAPER
Reliability and concurrent validity of the bubble inclinometer for visual estimation of straight leg raise in asymptomatic individuals
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
2
Physical Therapy Center, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Submission date: 2020-12-15
Acceptance date: 2023-11-21
Publication date: 2024-09-09
Corresponding author
Sirikarn Somprasong
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya,
Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
Physiother Quart. 2024;32(3):86-89
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The straight leg raise (SLR) test is commonly used to investigate neurodynamic problems or hamstring muscle length. Visual estimation can be used to identify the degrees of hip flexion during the SLR test. However, intra-tester and inter-tester reliability, as well as concurrent validity, await formal investigation.
Methods:
This study was an experimental study. Two testers, a novice and an experienced physical therapist, measured hip flexion angles during the SLR test using visual estimation for two sessions and the bubble inclinometer method during the first session in 31 asymptomatic participants, in random order. Intra-tester reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC3,3), inter-tester reliability (ICC2,3), concurrent validity (Pearson correlation with bubble inclinometer), and measurement error was represented as standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC), were calculated.
Results:
The concurrent validity and intra-tester reliability of visual estimation for both testers were good (ICC3,3 = 0.885 with 95% confidence interval = 0.775–0.943, p < 0.001) and excellent (ICC3,3 = 0.904 with 95% confidence interval = 0.810–0.952, p < 0.001), respectively. Inter-tester reliability of visual estimation was poor (ICC2,3 = 0.373 with 95% confidence interval = 0.027–0.639, p = 0.018).
Conclusions:
Although the concurrent validity of visual estimation with the bubble inclinometer was good, and intra-tester reliability was excellent, the inter-tester reliability was poor. Therefore, caution should be exercised if more than one tester is involved in visual estimation.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Boyd B, Villa P. Normal inter-limb differences during the straight leg raise neurodynamic test: a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:245; doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-245.
2.
Bohannon R. Cinematographic analysis of thepassive straight-leg-raising test for hamstring muscle length. Phys Ther. 1982;62(9):1269–74; doi: 10.1093/ptj/62.9.1269.
3.
Hellsing A. Tightness of hamstring and psoas majormuscles. A prospective study of back pain in young menduring their military service. Ups J Med Sci. 1988;93(3):267–76; doi: 10.3109/03009738809178552.
4.
Magee D. Orthopaedic Physical Assessment. Saunders; 2007:558–64.
5.
Clarkson H. Joint Motion and Function Assessment. A Research-Based Practical Guide. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005.
6.
Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of Clinical Research. Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall; 2009.
7.
Van Blommestein AS, MaCrae S, Lewis JS, Morrissey MC. Reliability of measuring thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle and straight leg raise with an inclinometer. Open Spine J. 2012;4:10–5; doi: 10.2174/1876532701204010010.
8.
Kolber MJ, Pizzini M, Robinson A, Yanez D, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of measurements used to quantify lumbar spine mobility: an analysis of an iphone® application and gravity based inclinometry. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(2):129–37.
9.
Boyd BS. Measurement properties of a hand-held inclinometer during straight leg raise neurodynamic testing. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(2):174–9; doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.04.352.
10.
dos Santos CM, Ferreira G, Malacco PL, Sabino GS, de Souza Moraes GF, Felício DC. Intra and inter examiner reliability and measurement error of goniometer and digital inclinometer use. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2012;18(1):38–41; doi:10.1590/S1517-6922012000100008.
11.
Youdas J, Bogard C, Suman V. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of ankle joint active range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(10):1113–8; doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90071-h.
12.
Youdas J, Carey J, Garrett T. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion-comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):98–104; doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.2.98.
13.
Watkins M, Riddle D, Lamb R, Personius W. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):90–6; doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.2.90.
14.
Pallant J. SPSS Survival Manual. A Step by Step guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. 3rd ed. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 2007: pp. 179–200.
15.
Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion. A Guide to Goniometry. FA Davis; 2009.
16.
Atkinson G, Nevill A. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26(4):217–38; doi: 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002.
17.
Boyd SB. Measurement properties of a hand-held inclinometer during straight leg raise neurodynamic testing. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(2):174–9; doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.04.352.
18.
Jacobs C, Christensen C, Hester P, Burandt DM, Sciascia AD. Errors in visual estimation of flexion contractures during total knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2013;4(3):120–3; doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.120.