ORIGINAL PAPER
Effectiveness of modified constraint induced movement therapy in restoring the fine motor function of upper limb among middle cerebral artery post stroke patients – a pilot study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
 
 
Submission date: 2024-04-29
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-02-13
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-02-13
 
 
Corresponding author
Ramana Kameswaran   

Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objective:
A cerebrovascular accident happens when brain cells suddenly die due to insufficient blood flow. One common result of a stroke affecting the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is the loss of upper limb function, which can have a significant impact on everyday activities. Mirror therapy (MT) and modified constraint induced movement therapy (mCIMT) are stroke rehabilitation methods for upper limb function. Mirror therapy stimulates brain areas such as the premotor and motor cortex using visual cues. In contrast, mCIMT restricts the unaffected arm, encourages repeated task practice, and utilises behavioural techniques to boost neuroplasticity, aiding in recovery.

Methods:
Twenty stroke survivors were assigned randomly to the mCIMT group (n = 10) or the MT group (n = 10). The mCIMT group received mCIMT, while the MT group underwent mirror therapy over ten weeks with four weekly sessions. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMAS) and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT).

Results:
The study highlights a significant enhancement in hand function in the mCIMT group compared to the MT group after 10 weeks of therapy. Post-treatment evaluations using the WMFT and FMAS yielded p-values less than 0.001, indicating a notable difference between the groups.

Conclusions:
Analyses within and between groups showed significant impacts, supporting mCIMT’s efficacy in enhancing fine motor skills among stroke patients with MCA involvement. These results stress the importance of personalised therapies such as mCIMT in post-stroke recovery, enhancing survivors’ standard of living and improving functional outcomes.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, Elkind MSV, George MG, Hamdan AD, Higashida RT, Hoh BL, Janis LS, Kase CS, Kleindorfer DO, Lee J-M, Moseley ME, Peterson ED, Turan TN, Valderrama AL, Vinters HV; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064–89; doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca.
 
2.
Adams Jr HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh 3rd EE. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):35–41; doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35.
 
3.
Saini V, Guada L, Yavagal DR. Global epidemiology of stroke and access to acuteischemic stroke interventions. Neurology. 2021;97(20 Suppl 2):6–16; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781.
 
4.
Murphy SJ, Werring DJ. Stroke: causes and clinical features. Medicine. 2020;48(9):561–6; doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2020.06.002.
 
5.
Kamalakannan S, Gudlavalleti AS, Gudlavalleti VS, Go­enka S, Kuper H. Incidence and prevalence of stroke in India: a systematic review. Ind J Med Res. 2017;146(2):175–85; doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_516_15.
 
6.
Navarro-Orozco D, Sánchez-Manso JC. Neuroanatomy, middle cerebral artery. InStatPearls [Internet] 2023. StatPearls Publishing.
 
7.
Park J, Lee N, Cho Y, Yang Y. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy for clients with chronic stroke: interrupted time series (ITS) design. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):963–6; doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.963.
 
8.
Malik AN, Tariq H, Afridi A, Rathore FA. Technological advancements in stroke rehabilitation. J Pak Med Assoc. 2022;72(8):1672–4; doi: 10.47391/JPMA.22-90.
 
9.
Gandhi DB, Sterba A, Khatter H, Pandian JD. Mirror therapy in stroke rehabilitation: current perspectives. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:75–85; doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S206883.
 
10.
Yang Y, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Wu Q, Jiang X, Cheng G. Effect of mirror therapy on recovery of stroke survivors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Neuroscience. 2018;390:318–36; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.06.044.
 
11.
Lee MM, Cho HY, Song CH. The mirror therapy program enhances upper-limb motor recovery and motor function in acute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(8):689–700; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31824fa86d.
 
12.
Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(4); doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004433.pub2.
 
13.
Yadav RK, Sharma R, Borah D, Kothari SY. Efficacy of modified constraint induced movement therapy in the treatment of hemiparetic upper limb in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(11):YC01; doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23468.8899.
 
14.
Ju Y, Yoon IJ. The effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy and mirror therapy on upper extremity function and its influence on activities of daily living. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(1):77–81; doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.77.
 
15.
Hsieh H-C, Liao R-D, Yang T-H, Leong C-P, Tso H-H, Wu J-Y, Huang Y-C. The clinical effect of Kinesio taping and modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function and spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;57(4):511–9; doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06542-4.
 
16.
Thieme H, Morkisch N, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Behrens J, Borgetto B, Dohle C. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(7):CD008449; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008449.pub3.
 
17.
Woodbury ML, Velozo CA, Richards LG, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upperextremity. Arch Phys Medicine Rehabil. 2007;88(6):715–23; doi: 10.1016/japmr. 2007.02.036.
 
18.
Hiragami S, Inoue Y, Harada K. Minimal clinically important difference for the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in convalescent stroke patients with moderate to severe hemiparesis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(11):917–21; doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.917.
 
19.
Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook III EW, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(6):750–5; doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183.
 
20.
Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CI, Curless RH, Barnes MP, Rodgers H. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(5):373–83; doi: 10.1191/026921599677595404.
 
21.
Birklein F, O’Neill D, Schlereth T. Complex regional pain syndrome: an optimistic perspective. Neurology. 2015;84(1):89–96; doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.04.031.
 
22.
Nogueira NG, Parma JO, de Assis Leão SE, de Souza Sales I, Macedo LC, Galvão AC, de Oliveira DC, Murça TM, Fernandes LA, Junqueira C, Lage GM, de Paula Ferreira B4. Mirror therapy in upper limb motor recovery and activities of daily living, and its neural correlates in stroke individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Res Bull. 2021;177:217–38; doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.10.003.
 
23.
Cao M, Li X. Effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for upper limb function intervention following stroke: a brief review. Sports Med Health Sci. 2021;3(3):134–7; doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2021.08.001.
 
24.
Lim KB, Lee HJ, Yoo J, Yun HJ, Hwang HJ. Efficacy of mirror therapy containing functional tasks in poststroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(4):629–36; doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.4.629.
 
25.
Fleet A, Page SJ, MacKay-Lyons M, Boe SG. Modified constraint-induced movementtherapy for upper extremity recovery post stroke: what is the evidence?. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(4):319–31; doi: 10.1310/tsr2104-319.
 
26.
Hijikata N, Kawakami M, Ishii R, Tsuzuki K, Nakamura T, Okuyama K, Liu M. Item difficulty of Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity in persons with chronic stroke with moderate-to-severe upper limb impairment. Front Neurol. 2020;11:577855; doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.577855.
 
27.
Hodics TM, Nakatsuka K, Upreti B, Alex A, Smith PS, Pezzullo JC. Wolf Motor Function Test for characterizing moderate to severe hemiparesis in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(11):1963–7; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.002.
 
eISSN:2544-4395
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top