ORIGINAL PAPER
The effect of supervised exercise intervention program on the quality of life, disability, anxiety, and depression in post-lumbar discectomy patients
1
Ministry of Health, Gaza, Palestine
2
Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Al-Azhar University, Gaza, Palestine
3
Department of Physical Therapy, Al-Azhar University, Gaza, Palestine
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-06-22
Acceptance date: 2025-12-15
Online publication date: 2026-08-27
Corresponding author
Mosab Aldabbas
Department of Physical Therapy, Al-Azhar University, Jamal Abdl Naser St., Gaza, Palestine
Department of Physical Therapy, Al-Azhar University, Jamal Abdl Naser St., Gaza, Palestine
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Lumbar discectomy is commonly performed to relieve nerve root compression, but many patients experience ongoing pain and disability post-surgery. Supervised physiotherapy may improve these outcomes, though its benefits remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a physiotherapy program on quality of life, pain, disability, anxiety, and depression after lumbar discectomy.
Methods:
A Quasi-Experimental Study was conducted involving 34 patients (17 males, 17 females; mean age 48.38 ± 6.88 years). A simple block randomisation method with a block size of four was applied. Participants were randomly allocated to a supervised group (n = 17), which received a supervised physiotherapy exercise program (breathing, strengthening, and stretching exercises), or to a home-based exercise group (n = 17), which received advice only. Quality of life, pain intensity, disability, anxiety, and depression were assessed at baseline, after six weeks, and at a four-week follow-up using the Short Form-36, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, respectively. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test and visual inspection of histograms. When the ANOVA showed a significant effect, Bonferroni post-hoc tests were applied to identify pairwise differences.
Results:
Repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant improvements over time in all instruments (p < 0.01). Significant time × group interactions were observed for pain, disability, depression, and several quality-of-life domains, indicating greater improvements in the supervised group. Between-group comparisons also favoured the supervised group for pain, disability, and depression (all p < 0.01), demonstrating the effectiveness of the physiotherapy intervention.
Conclusions:
The physiotherapy program effectively enhances recovery following lumbar discectomy and should be integrated into standard postoperative care.
Lumbar discectomy is commonly performed to relieve nerve root compression, but many patients experience ongoing pain and disability post-surgery. Supervised physiotherapy may improve these outcomes, though its benefits remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a physiotherapy program on quality of life, pain, disability, anxiety, and depression after lumbar discectomy.
Methods:
A Quasi-Experimental Study was conducted involving 34 patients (17 males, 17 females; mean age 48.38 ± 6.88 years). A simple block randomisation method with a block size of four was applied. Participants were randomly allocated to a supervised group (n = 17), which received a supervised physiotherapy exercise program (breathing, strengthening, and stretching exercises), or to a home-based exercise group (n = 17), which received advice only. Quality of life, pain intensity, disability, anxiety, and depression were assessed at baseline, after six weeks, and at a four-week follow-up using the Short Form-36, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, respectively. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test and visual inspection of histograms. When the ANOVA showed a significant effect, Bonferroni post-hoc tests were applied to identify pairwise differences.
Results:
Repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant improvements over time in all instruments (p < 0.01). Significant time × group interactions were observed for pain, disability, depression, and several quality-of-life domains, indicating greater improvements in the supervised group. Between-group comparisons also favoured the supervised group for pain, disability, and depression (all p < 0.01), demonstrating the effectiveness of the physiotherapy intervention.
Conclusions:
The physiotherapy program effectively enhances recovery following lumbar discectomy and should be integrated into standard postoperative care.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Yao M, Xu B-P, Li Z-J, Zhu S, Tian Z-R, Li D-H, Cen J, Cheng S-D, Wang Y-J, Guo Y-M, Cui X-J. A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):175. doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01403-2.
2.
Hammed A, Al-Qiami A, Alsalhi H, Almansi A, Massoud M, Alzawahreh A, Hamouda A, Tanislav C. Surgical vs. conservative management of chronic sciatica (> 3 months) due to lumbar disc herniation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e59617; doi: 10.7759/cureus.59617.
3.
Riesenburger R, Klimo P, Safain MG, Benzel EC. Motion-Sparing, Nonimplant Surgery. In: Benzel’s Spine Surgery, 2-Volume Set. Elsevier; 2017; pp. 1575–80.e2. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.co...; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-40030-5.00181-7 (accessed 06.09.2025).
4.
Barnaba A, Sailhan F. Epidemiology of the causes of complaints after discectomy collected from a French insurance company [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Traumatol. 2023;109(6):840–7; doi: 10.1016/j.rcot.2023.03.006.
5.
Postacchini F, Giannicola G, Cinotti G. Recovery of motor deficits after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(7):1040–5; doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.0841040.
6.
Dorow M, Löbner M, Stein J, Konnopka A, Meisel HJ, Günther L, Meixensberger J, Stengler K, König HH, Riedel-Heller SG. Risk factors for postoperative pain intensity in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery: a systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0170303; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170303.
7.
Yu H, Cancelliere C, Mior S, Pereira P, Nordin M, Brunton G, Wong JJ, Shearer HM, Connell G, Ead L, Verville L, Rezai M, Myrtos D, Wang D, Marchand A-A, Romanelli A, Germann D, To D, Young JJ, Southerst D, Candelaria H, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P. Effectiveness of postsurgical rehabilitation following lumbar disc herniation surgery: a systematic review. Brain Spine. 2024;4:102806; doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102806.
8.
Matarán-Peñarrocha GA, Lara Palomo IC, Antequera Soler E, Gil-Martínez E, Fernández-Sánchez M, Aguilar-Ferrándiz ME, María Castro-Sánchez A. Comparison of efficacy of a supervised versus non-supervised physical therapy exercise program on the pain, functionality and quality of life of patients with non-specific chronic low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(7):948–59; doi: 10.1177/0269215520927076.
9.
Oosterhuis T, Costa LO, Maher CG, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW, Ostelo RW. Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. Cochrane Back and Neck Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(3):CD003007; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3.
10.
Scandelli F, De Leo D, Marino G, De Martino E, Cannizzaro D, Adamo P, Temporiti F. Effects of supervised rehabilitation on psychosocial and participation-related outcomes after lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(23):7246; doi: 10.3390/jcm13237246.
11.
Du S, Cui Z, Peng S, Wu J, Xu J, Mo W, Ye J. Clinical efficacy of exercise therapy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med. 2025;12:1531637; doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1531637.
12.
Bekeris J, Wilson LA, Fiasconaro M, Poeran J, Liu J, Girardi F, Memtsoudis SG1. New onset depression and anxiety after spinal fusion surgery: incidence and risk factors. Spine. 2020;45(16):1161–9; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003467.
13.
Ozkara GO, Ozgen M, Ozkara E, Armagan O, Arslantas A, Atasoy MA. Assessment of the effectiveness of physical therapy and rehabilitation programme starts immediately after lumbar disc surgery. Turkish Neurosurg. 2015; 25(3):372–9; doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8440-13.0.
14.
Cuschieri S. The CONSORT statement. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(Suppl 1):27–30; doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_559_18.
15.
Goodyear MDE, Krleza-Jeric K, Lemmens T. The Declaration of Helsinki. BMJ. 2007;335(7621):624–5; doi: 10.1136/bmj.39339.610000.BE.
16.
Solum S, Altan L, Kasapoğlu Aksoy M. The effect of physical therapy and core stabilization exercises in failed back surgery syndrome. J PMR Sci. 2022;25(1):89–99; doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2021-84534.
17.
Comer C, Redmond AC, Bird HA, Hensor EMA, Conaghan PG. A home exercise programme is no more beneficial than advice and education for people with neurogenic claudication: results from a randomised controlled trial. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(9):e72878; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072878.
18.
Lee GT, Himler P, Rhon DI, Young JL. Home exercise programs are infrequently prescribed in trials of supervised exercise for individuals with low back pain: a scoping review of 292 randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023;53(3):120–42; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11448.
19.
Sung Y-T, Wu J-S. The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): a new technique for psychological measurement. Behav Res Methods. 2018;50(4):1694–715; doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8.
20.
Boonstra AM, Preuper HRS, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31(2):165–9; doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93.
21.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):240–52; doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
22.
Yakut E, Düger T, Öksüz Ç, Yörükan S, Üreten K, Turan D, Frat T, Kiraz S, Krd N, Kayhan H, Yakut Y, Güler C. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29(5):581–5; doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000113869.13209.03.
23.
Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine. 2008;33(1):90–4; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10.
24.
Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:205031211667172; doi: 10.1177/2050312116671725.
25.
Manchikanti L. Quality of life evaluation. Anesth Pain Med. 2012;1(3):203–4; doi: 10.5812/kowsar.22287523.3548.
26.
Rishi P, Rishi E, Maitray A, Agarwal A, Nair S, Gopalakrishnan S. Hospital anxiety and depression scale assessment of 100 patients before and after using low vision care: a prospective study in a tertiary eye-care setting. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(11):1203–8; doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_436_17.
27.
Carreon LY, Jespersen AB, Støttrup CC, Hansen KH, Andersen MO. Is the hospital anxiety and depression scale associated with outcomes after lumbar spine surgery?. Global Spine J. 2020;10(3):266–71; doi: 10.1177/2192568219845662.
28.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
29.
Beneck GJ, Popovich JM, Selkowitz DM, Azen S, Kulig K; Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network (PTClinResNet). Intensive, progressive exercise improves quality of life following lumbar microdiskectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(9):892–901; doi: 10.1177/0269215514525059.
30.
Harts CC, Helmhout PH, De Bie RA, Bart Staal J. A high-intensity lumbar extensor strengthening program is little better than a low-intensity program or a waiting list control group for chronic low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. Aust J Physioth. 2008;54(1):23–31; doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(08)70062-X.
31.
Ziętalewicz U, Bargiel-Matusiewicz K. Model of quality of life in a group of people with chronic low back pain. Health Psychol Rep. 2024;12(4):337–51; doi: 10.5114/hpr/185302.
32.
Uysal E, Cine HS, Cetin E. The necessity and timing of exercise after lumbar disc herniation surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(20):9521–9; doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202310_34125.
33.
Machado GC, Pinheiro MB. Early comprehensive physiotherapy after lumbar spine surgery (PEDro synthesis). Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(2):96–7; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098165.
34.
Özden F, Koçyiğit GZ. The effect of early rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Egypt J Neurosurg. 2024;39(1):8; doi: 10.1186/s41984-024-00270-z.
35.
Wilczyński J, Kasprzak A. Dynamics of changes in isometric strength and muscle imbalance in the treatment of women with low back pain. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6139535; doi: 10.1155/2020/6139535.
36.
Atsidakou N, Matsi AE, Christakou A. The effectiveness of exercise program after lumbar discectomy surgery. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;16:99–105; doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.030.
37.
Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):927–32; doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021.
38.
Jentoft ES, Kvåle A, Assmus J, Moen VP. Effect of information and exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Physioth Res Intl. 2020;25(4):e1864; doi: 10.1002/pri.1864.
39.
Oosterhuis T, Costa LO, Maher CG, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW, Ostelo RW. Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. Cochrane Back and Neck Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(3):CD003007; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3.
40.
Rushton A, Heneghan NR, Heap A, White L, Calvert M, Goodwin PC. Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of rehabilitation following primary lumbar discectomy: a qualitative focus group study embedded within an external pilot and feasibility trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e015878; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015878.
41.
Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Lawrence B, Spiker R, Brodke D. What are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(10):2027–36; doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.
42.
Petrelis M, Soultanis K, Michopoulos I, Nikolaou V. Efficacy of a conservative physical treatment regimen on psychological status and quality of life in Greek patients with chronic low back pain. Psychiatriki. 2023;35(1):54–65; doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2023.027.
43.
Ziętalewicz U, Bargiel-Matusiewicz K. Model of quality of life in a group of people with chronic low back pain. Health Psychol Rep. 2024; 12(4):337–51; doi: 10.5114/hpr/185302.
44.
Longo UG, Papalia R, De Salvatore S, Marinozzi A, Piergentili I, Lalli A, Bandini B, Franceschetti E, Denaro V. Establishing the minimum clinically significant difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom score (PASS) for the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in patients with rotator cuff disease and shoulder prosthesis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(4):1540; doi: 10.3390/jcm12041540.
45.
Wang Z, Liu X, Gao K, Tuo H, Zhang X, Liu W. Clinical effects and biological mechanisms of exercise on lumbar disc herniation. Front Physiol. 2024;15:1309663; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1309663.
46.
Heidarzadeh M, Zamanzadeh V, Maghvan AP, Oshvandi K. The effect of physical exercise on physical and psychological problems. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2010;15(1):20–6.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
