ORIGINAL PAPER
Instrument-assisted release of quadratus lumborum on pelvic posture and iliopsoas muscle length in non-specific low back pain: a double blinded placebo controlled trial
1
Department of Orthopaedic Physiotherapy, KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, India
Submission date: 2024-08-14
Acceptance date: 2025-05-06
Online publication date: 2026-02-03
Corresponding author
Peeyoosha Gurudut
Department of Orthopaedic Physiotherapy, KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Department of Orthopaedic Physiotherapy, KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objective:
The iliopsoas and quadratus lumborum muscles, linked anatomically, stiffen and contribute to anterior pelvic tilt in non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Though iliopsoas’ deep location limits direct release, instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilisation (IASTM) is gaining popularity, requiring further investigation. The primary objective was to evaluate IASTM effects on iliopsoas length, pelvic posture, pain and disability in NSLBP participants.
Methods:
Thirty-two participants with NSLBP and quadratus lumborum tightness were randomly allocated using a simple random method in the present double-blinded (assessor and patients) placebo-controlled trial. In addition to conventional physiotherapy (Interferential and Ultrasound therapies) the experimental group (n = 16) received IASTM, while the control group (n = 16) received sham IASTM on alternate days for 5 sessions across 10 days, each session lasting for 45 min. The primary outcomes included iliopsoas length (measured by ultrasonography and modified Thomas test), pelvic posture (APCES software) while the secondary outcomes were Quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS), and pain intensity by visual analogue scale (VAS). Assessments were done pre- and post-treatment (10 days).
Results:
Significant increases in iliopsoas length (effect size right: 0.76, left: 0.81), decreased modified Thomas test angles (effect size right: 0.78, left: 0.80), reduced pelvic tilt (effect size: 1.07), disability score (effect size: 1.44) and VAS (effect size: 1.47) were observed in the IASTM group with p < 0.001. The between-groups analysis showed a significant difference in the IASTM group for all outcomes (p < 0.05) except the disability scale (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
IASTM of quadratus lumborum significantly reduced pelvic tilt and increased iliopsoas length, suggesting its potential for effective soft tissue release in NSLBP.
The iliopsoas and quadratus lumborum muscles, linked anatomically, stiffen and contribute to anterior pelvic tilt in non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Though iliopsoas’ deep location limits direct release, instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilisation (IASTM) is gaining popularity, requiring further investigation. The primary objective was to evaluate IASTM effects on iliopsoas length, pelvic posture, pain and disability in NSLBP participants.
Methods:
Thirty-two participants with NSLBP and quadratus lumborum tightness were randomly allocated using a simple random method in the present double-blinded (assessor and patients) placebo-controlled trial. In addition to conventional physiotherapy (Interferential and Ultrasound therapies) the experimental group (n = 16) received IASTM, while the control group (n = 16) received sham IASTM on alternate days for 5 sessions across 10 days, each session lasting for 45 min. The primary outcomes included iliopsoas length (measured by ultrasonography and modified Thomas test), pelvic posture (APCES software) while the secondary outcomes were Quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS), and pain intensity by visual analogue scale (VAS). Assessments were done pre- and post-treatment (10 days).
Results:
Significant increases in iliopsoas length (effect size right: 0.76, left: 0.81), decreased modified Thomas test angles (effect size right: 0.78, left: 0.80), reduced pelvic tilt (effect size: 1.07), disability score (effect size: 1.44) and VAS (effect size: 1.47) were observed in the IASTM group with p < 0.001. The between-groups analysis showed a significant difference in the IASTM group for all outcomes (p < 0.05) except the disability scale (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
IASTM of quadratus lumborum significantly reduced pelvic tilt and increased iliopsoas length, suggesting its potential for effective soft tissue release in NSLBP.
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Wilson E, Payton O, Donegan-Shoaf L, Dec K. Muscle energy technique in participants with acute low back pain: a pilot clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(9):502–12; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.9.502.
2.
Sions JM, Elliott JM, Pohlig RT, Hicks GE. Trunk muscle characteristics of the multifidi, erector spinae, psoas, and quadratus lumborum in older adults with and without chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(3):173–9; doi: 10.2519/JOSPT.2017.7002.
3.
Liebenson C. The quadratus lumborum and spinal stability. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2000;1(4):49–54.
4.
Hains G. Locating and treating low back pain of myofascial origin by ischemic compression. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2002;46(4):257–64.
5.
Siccardi MA, Tariq MA, Valle C. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Psoas Major. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2023.
6.
Santaguida PL, McGill SM. The psoas major muscle: a three-dimensional geometric study. J Biomech. 1995;28(3):339–45; doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00064-b.
7.
Graves JE, Webb DC, Pollock ML, Matkozich J, Leggett SH, Carpenter DM, Foster DN, J Cirulli Pelvic stabilization during resistance training: its effect on the development of lumbar extension strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(2):210–5; doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90398-0.
8.
Stewart S, Stanton W, Wilson S, Hides J. Consistency in size and asymmetry of the psoas major muscle among elite footballers. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(16):1173–7; doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058909.
9.
Hellsing AL. Tightness of hamstring-and psoas major muscles: a prospective study of back pain in young men during their military service. Ups J Med Sci. 1988;93(3):267–76; doi: 10.3109/03009738809178552.
10.
Barker KL, Shamley DR, Jackson D. Changes in the cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas in participants with unilateral back pain: the relationship to pain and disability. Spine. 2004;29(22):515–9; doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144405.11661.eb.
11.
Jorgensson A. The iliopsoas muscle and the lumbar spine. Aust J Physiother. 1993;39(2):125–32; doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60477-3.
12.
Oshikawa T, Adachi G, Akuzawa H, Okubo Y, Kaneoka K. Activity of the quadratus lumborum and trunk muscles relates to pelvic tilt angle during pelvic tilt exercises. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(12):1109–15; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001496.
13.
Jairakdee Y, Chansirinukor W, Sitti T. Effect of releasing quadratus lumborum muscle on hip and knee muscle length in asymptomatic individuals. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;26:542–7; doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.11.008.
14.
Twomey LT, Taylor JR. Physical Therapy of the Low Back. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994.
15.
Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Travell & Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction. The Trigger Point Manual. Vol. 1. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1999.
16.
Rezasoltani A. The applicability of muscle ultrasonography in physiotherapy researches. J Phys Ther Sci. 2003;15(1):33–7; doi: 10.1589/jpts.15.33.
17.
Mendis DM, Wilson SJ, Stanton WR, Hides JA. Validity of real-time ultrasound imaging to measure anterior hip muscle size: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(9):577–81; doi: 10.2519/JOSPT.2010.3286.
18.
Baker RT, Nasypany A, Seegmiller JG, Baker JG. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization treatment for tissue extensibility dysfunction. Int J Athletic Ther Train. 2013;18(5):16–21, doi: 10.1123/ijatt.18.5.16.
19.
Karmali A, Walizada A, Stuber K. The efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. J Contemp Chiropr. 2019;2(1):25–33.
20.
Baker RT, Hansberger BL, Warren L, Nasypany A. A novel approach for the reversal of chronic apparent hamstring tightness: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(5):723–33.
21.
Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, Traeger AC, Lin CC, Chenot JF, van Tulder M, Koes BW. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(11):2791–803; doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2.
22.
Albornoz-Cabello M, Maya-Martín J, Domínguez-Maldonado G, Espejo-Antúnez L, Heredia-Rizo AM. Effect of interferential current therapy on pain perception and disability level in subjects with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(2):242–9; doi: 10.0117/0269215516639653.
23.
Cheatham SW, Baker R, Kreiswirth E. Instrument assisted soft-tissue mobilization: a commentary on clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation professionals. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019;14(4):670–82.
24.
Martinoli C. Musculoskeletal ultrasound: technical guidelines. Insights Imaging. 2010;1(3):99–141; doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0032-9.
25.
Ito K, Maeshima E, Arai N, Saito K, Koshiba H, Maruyama J, Asada K, Nakamata T, Yamaguchi K, Hatanaka Y. Evaluation of the anatomical cross-sectional area of psoas major muscle using an ultrasound imaging system combined with an inertial measurement unit. Transl Sports Med. 2024;2024:7774612; doi: 10.1155/2024/7774612.
26.
Clapis PA, Davis SM, Davis RO. Reliability of inclinometer and goniometric measurements of hip extension flexibility using the modified Thomas test. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24(2):135–41; doi: 10.1080/09593980701378256.
27.
Szucs KA, Brown EV. Rater reliability and construct validity of a mobile application for posture analysis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(1):31–6; doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.31.
28.
Welling A, Gurudut P, Shirodkar G, Shetye N, Khan S, Validation of non-radiographic APECS software in comparison with standard radiographic measurement of full-length lower limb hip-knee-ankle angle in elderly obese women. Physiother Quart. 2023;31(1):90–4; doi: 10.5114/pq.2023.119865.
29.
Schoppink LE, van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Beurskens SA, de Bie RA. Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 1996;76(3):268–75; doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.3.268.
30.
Yarnitsky D, Sprecher E, Zaslansky R, Hemli JA. Multiple session experimental pain measurement. Pain. 1996;67(2):327–33; doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03110-7.
31.
Syinta AN, Komalasari DR. Reliability and validity of the Visual Analogue Scale in non-myogenic low back pain participants. In: Academic Physiotherapy Conference (APC) 2024 “Let’s Know and Fix Vertigo”. Proceeding. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta; 2024; pp. 9–19.
32.
Kim J, Sung DJ, Lee J. Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury: mechanisms and practical application. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017;13(1):12–22; doi: 10.12965/jer.1732824.412.
33.
Ikeda N, Otsuka S, Kawanishi Y, Kawakami Y. Effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on musculoskeletal properties. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(10):2166; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002035.
34.
Pandey E, Kumar N, Das S. Effect of stretching on shortened quadratus lumborum muscle in non specific low back pain. Physiother Occup Ther J. 2018;11(2):80–6.
35.
Bhosale SV, Burungale MD. Effectiveness of myofascial release, muscle energy technique and stretching of quadrartus lumborum muscle in participants with non-specific low back pain. J Ecophysiol Occup Health. 2022;21(4):132–41; doi: 10.18311/jeoh/2021/28561.
36.
Atia AM, Chabara AA, Abdelmageed SF, Samir SM. Effect of passive stretching exercises versus post isometric relaxation technique on pain intensity in quadratus lumborum trigger points on lower back myofascial pain syndrome. Med J Cairo Univ. 2024;91(12):1519–23; doi: 10.21608/mjcu.2024.342730.
37.
Hall BH. Example myofascial pain case: quadratus lumborum trigger point and chronic low back pain. In: Hall BH (eds.) Evaluation and Management of Chronic Pain for Primary Care. Cham: Springer; 2020:261–74; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47117-0_20.
38.
Mahmood T, Abrar AIP, Atif MM, Mahmood W, Batool F. Effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy for pain, mobility, and disability in chronic low backache participants: a quasi-experimental study. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2024;28(3):452–8; doi: 10.35975/apic.v28i3.2459.
39.
Lambert M, Hitchcock R, Lavallee K, Hayford E, Morazzini R, Wallace A, Conroy D, Cleland J. The effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization compared to other interventions on pain and function: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev. 2017;22(1–2):76–85; doi: 10.1080/10833196.2017.1304184.
40.
Wang Z, Makai A, Czakó D, Tumpek N, Bogdán K, Járomi M. The effect of back school intervention on Chinese participants with chronic low back pain. Health Prob Civil. 2023;17(4):368–87; doi: 10.5114/hpc.2023.131868.
41.
Fatoye F, Mbada CE, Akano T, Oyewole OO, Odole AC, Fatoye C, Egwu M, Kolade AA. Real-world effectiveness and costs of vertical oscillatory pressure manipulation for low back pain. Physiother Quart. 2023;31(2):71–8; doi: 10.5114/pq.2023.125749.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2544-4395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
